Thermal Conductivity of a Metal Rod

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the thermal conductivity of a metal rod with one end heated and the other end cooled, leading to the melting of ice. The rod's dimensions and the mass of ice melted over a specific time are provided, along with the relevant heat transfer equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the heat transfer formula but questions their assumptions regarding the heat transfer rate and the conversion of units. Other participants inquire about the specific numerical results and suggest checking unit conversions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants seeking clarification on the calculations and unit conversions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the importance of ensuring proper unit conversions, particularly for the cross-sectional area.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may impose specific rules on the presentation of work and assumptions made in calculations.

Koshi
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



One end of an insulated metal rod is maintained at 100^\circ C and the other end is maintained at 0.00 ^\circ {\rm C} by an ice–water mixture. The rod has a length of 75.0 cm and a cross-sectional area of 1.40 cm^2. The heat conducted by the rod melts a mass of 7.85 g of ice in a time of 15.0 min. Find the thermal conductivity k of the metal.


Homework Equations



H=dQ/dt=kA(T2-T1)/L

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to solve for k using the formula for heat transfer and since H was not given, I substituted it with dQ/dt. Then in stead of dQ I used the equation for heat transformation Q=mL where m=mass of ice melted and L=333kj/kg which is the heat of fusion for water, if I'm not mistaken. I put everything in SI units and solved but I got the wrong answer. Did I make a wrong assumption somewhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That all sounds good but the devil is in the details. What answer did you get?
 
I got the answer 0.0022796947 w/(m*K)
 
is there anyone else who can help me find out where I went wrong?
 
Please show one's work, particularly, the value obtained for heat flux. If one is off by 4-orders of magnitude, look at the value for cross-sectional area given in cm2 and make sure it is properly converted to m2.

I obtain a value on the order of the thermal conductivity of a metal. Thermal conductivity of Al is about 200 W/m-K, and that of Cu is about 385 W/m-K.

Ref: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/tables/thrcn.html#c1
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
9K