Thermal decomposition of calcium carbonate - problem

AI Thread Summary
The thermal decomposition of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) results in a mass decrease of 1/5, leading to confusion about the number of molecules decomposed. Initially, a sample of 100g (1 mole) of CaCO3 was considered, with a 20g loss equating to 0.2 moles. However, the discussion clarified that the mass loss corresponds to the production of CO2, not a direct loss of CaCO3. The correct interpretation shows that 0.45 moles of CaCO3 decomposed, resulting in 45 molecules per 100. The final composition indicates 45% CaO in the remaining sample, aligning with the chemical reaction's stoichiometry.
wuutoshi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello, here goes the problem:
The mass of calcium carbonate upon thermal decomposition decreased by 1/5. (a) How many molecules of CaCO3 per 100 molecules were decomposed to CaO and CO2. (b) The content of CaO in the final sample express in molar fraction.

My solution:
I set the starting sample to 100g which corresponds to 1 mole of CaCO3. The decrease of mass by 1/5 corresponds to 20g or 0.2 mole. So the solution seems to me to be 20 molecules per 100 molecules.
Ad (b) If 0.2 mole of CaCO3 were decomposed, 0.2 mole of CaO and 0.2 mole CO2 should be formed. Thus the molar fraction of CaO in final samples should be 0.2/(0.2+0.2+0.8) = 1/6.

Yet the provided solutions from two scources differs. Where, if so, did I make mistake?
Thank you for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wuutoshi said:
I set the starting sample to 100g which corresponds to 1 mole of CaCO3.

OK

The decrease of mass by 1/5 corresponds to 20g

OK

or 0.2 mole.

No. Mass decreased by 20 g, but it doesn't mean 20 g decomposed and disappeared.

Write reaction equation - what is lost during decomposition? What is left?

And please, don't ignore the template.
 
Borek said:
No. Mass decreased by 20 g, but it doesn't mean 20 g decomposed and disappeared.
CaCO3 → CaO + CO2

Doesn't 20 g of the decomposed reactant corresponds to decomposition of 0.2 mole of that reactant? I don't assume that mass dissappeares. It appears as 20 g of products (0.4 moles of them). So now we are left with 0.8 moles of CaCO3, isn't that true?

And please, don't ignore the template.

Ok.
 
Last edited:
I already asked you - what is lost, what is left? Add state symbols to all three substances and it should become obvious.
 
Should I assume that 20 g went away as CO2? So from 1 to 1 mole ratio, 0.45 moles of CaCO3 decomposed, which corresponds to 45 molecules per 100 molecules.
We are left with 0.45 moles of CaO and 0.55 moles of CaCO3 which is 45 % of CaO in the final sample.
Ok, the solutions agree.
Thank you, Borek, for making me think and approaching the problem from more real and "chemical point of view".
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top