A Thermal Field Theory: Calculating Angular Distribution of CMB

shahbaznihal
Messages
52
Reaction score
2
What is the basic idea and purpose of the thermal field theory? I don't need a full in depth description of it, not at the moment at least. I am just trying to understand how it is relevant in the calculation of angular distribution of temperature of CMB(Comic Microwave Background) over the sky.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Usual" quantum field theory calculations are all done with respect to the ground state of the system; correlation functions are all taken with respect to the ground state. In other words, they are done at zero temperature, which is a perfectly valid approximation for many applications.

However, in some applications you are working at finite temperature, or maybe you explicitly want temperature-dependent observables like the specific heat. For example, if your system is in equilibrium with some temperature T, you need to sum over all excited states with each state weighted by a Boltzmann factor:
<br /> \langle A \rangle = \frac{1}{Z}\sum_n \langle n | A | n \rangle e^{-\beta E_n} = \frac{\mathrm{Tr}\left( A e^{- \beta H} \right)}{\mathrm{Tr}\left( e^{- \beta H} \right)}<br />
Computing these expectation values using perturbation theory/diagrams is done using the Matsubara formalism, which you can find in many textbooks.

I'm not familiar enough with cosmology to know the specific application to the CMB which you mentioned.
 
  • Like
Likes atyy
Thanks for the introduction. I was studying a review paper on the Cosmic Microwave Background. The temperature is written as a sum of Spherical Harmonics. I stumbled upon the thermal field theory when they mentioned something called the two point temperature function and I did not know what that meant. May be you could shed some light on this as well (?).

Many thanks for your time.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top