A Thermal Neutrinos: Detecting Ancient Particles in the Universe?

Cato
Messages
56
Reaction score
10
Would neutrinos emitted in the distant and early universe be slowed enough to become thermal neutrinos? Could these be detected?
 
  • Like
Likes Orodruin
Physics news on Phys.org
The cosmic neutrino background should be thermal. PTOLEMY is a plan to measure it.

Neutrinos emitted by nuclear processes after the big bang are not thermal, even if they become slow in the very distant future their energy spectrum will look different.
 
mfb said:
The cosmic neutrino background should be thermal. PTOLEMY is a plan to measure it.

Neutrinos emitted by nuclear processes after the big bang are not thermal, even if they become slow in the very distant future their energy spectrum will look different.

Do the cosmic background neutrinos remain in thermal equilibrium by interacting with matter? Or are they thermal simply because of the effects of expansion?
 
Cato said:
Do the cosmic background neutrinos remain in thermal equilibrium by interacting with matter? Or are they thermal simply because of the effects of expansion?

The latter.

Before decoupling, neutrinos were in thermal equilibrium with the "cosmic soup". It can be shown that after decoupling, expansion of the universe redshifts a thermal spectrum for radiation into a thermal spectrum. Weinberg in his book "Cosmology" demonstrates his on pages 101-102. Weinberg

Thus the photon density has been given a black-body form even after hye photons went out of equilibrium with matter, but with a redshifted temperature.

The above applies to massless neutrinos, which is a good approximation for some of the history of the universe. Their non-zero masses, however, gradually shift their spectrum away from a thermal spectrum. From "Relativistic Cosmology" by Ellis, Maartens, and MacCallum page 304:

The most massive neutrinos become non-relativistic well after radiation matter inequality. We can estimate the non-relativistic redshift by setting the mean energy per neutrino equal to the mass.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Terrific. Thanks very much.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top