Thermal time scale in tubular flow reactors

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating the thermal time scale for reagents in a tubular reactor used for nanoparticle synthesis. Participants explore the heating process of the reagents as they enter a furnace, considering factors such as thermal capacity, thermal resistance, and Biot number. The scope includes theoretical analysis and practical estimation methods.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests estimating the time for reagents to reach furnace temperature by finding the thermal capacity of the fluid and multiplying it by the thermal resistance of the tube to obtain a time constant.
  • Another participant questions the validity of using lumped system analysis due to a Biot number greater than 0.1, indicating potential limitations in the approach.
  • A participant calculates a thermal time constant of ~3 s and a total time of ~17 seconds to reach final temperature, expressing surprise at the longer duration compared to expectations.
  • Concerns are raised about the low thermal conductivity of the liquid and the potential significance of radiative transfer in the heating process.
  • One participant proposes modeling the liquid as a solid thermal barrier with an equivalent thermal mass, suggesting an alternative perspective on the heating dynamics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriateness of the lumped system analysis given the Biot number, and there is no consensus on the validity of the proposed methods or the calculated time estimates.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the assumptions in lumped system analysis and the influence of thermal properties on the heating process, which remain unresolved.

MSM
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
So if I have a tubular reactor for nanoparticle synthesis (PTFE tubes ID:2mm). The tubes are heated in a furnace. liquid Reagents at room temperature are pumped by a syringe pump and directed toward the furnace. The reagents decompose to form nanoparticles once they reach the steady-state furnace temperature. How can I estimate how long it takes for the reagents to to reach the set temperature in the furnace once they enter the furnace?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
To Estimate:

Find the thermal capacity of the fluid.
Multiply by the thermal resistance of the tube.
This will give you the Time Constant for the heating process. (the time it takes to reach 63% of final temperature)
Multiply by 5.

Cheers,
Tom

p.s. If you are familiar with electrical circuits, the equivalent is a series RC being charged by a voltage source.

p.p.s. You can use this same approach in your previous thread regarding a continuously flowing fluid. It won't be exact (the calculated time will be too short) but is at least a starting point for low flow rates.
 
Last edited:
Tom.G said:
To Estimate:

Find the thermal capacity of the fluid.
Multiply by the thermal resistance of the tube.
This will give you the Time Constant for the heating process. (the time it takes to reach 63% of final temperature)
Multiply by 5.

Cheers,
Tom

p.s. If you are familiar with electrical circuits, the equivalent is a series RC being charged by a voltage source.

p.p.s. You can use this same approach in your previous thread regarding a continuously flowing fluid. It won't be exact (the calculated time will be too short) but is at least a starting point for low flow rates.
I tried the lumped system analysis, but my understanding is that for this method to be valid, Biot Number (Bi) has to be less than 0.1 (Bi<0.1).

Now consider a fluid with thermal conductivity k=0.14 W/m K, and heat capacity Cp= 2500 J/kg K, and density of 780 kg/m3.
Now for long pipes, Nu=3.68, and with a tube internal diameter of 2 mm, I get a heat transfer coefficient of 257 W/m2 K. This gives us a Bi=0.9. Now with this information , I get a thermal time constant of ~3 s-1. and t~17 seconds to reach final temperature. Does this seem reasonable? because I expected few seconds or lower

In this case, can I still use the method you suggested?
 
Last edited:
Well you got much deeper into it than I ever did! We could start a long Q&A on this but a better bet is to get the attention of those more versed in the 'non-common' situations.

Let's see if paging @Chestermiller gets better input for you.

If I understand the numbers you supplied, the thermal conductivity of the liquid is extremely low with a moderately high thermal capacity. If that is the case, how about modeling the liquid as a solid thermal barrier with an equivalent 'perfect' (zero size, infinite conductivity) thermal mass at the center?

As I understand the Biot number, it considers convective heat transfer at the surface. With the temperatures you have wouldn't radiative transfer also be significant?

Cheers,
Tom
 
Tom.G said:
Well you got much deeper into it than I ever did! We could start a long Q&A on this but a better bet is to get the attention of those more versed in the 'non-common' situations.

Let's see if paging @Chestermiller gets better input for you.

If I understand the numbers you supplied, the thermal conductivity of the liquid is extremely low with a moderately high thermal capacity. If that is the case, how about modeling the liquid as a solid thermal barrier with an equivalent 'perfect' (zero size, infinite conductivity) thermal mass at the center?

As I understand the Biot number, it considers convective heat transfer at the surface. With the temperatures you have wouldn't radiative transfer also be significant?

Cheers,
Tom
See my response to the other thread. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/heat-transfer-in-thin-tubes.1003289/#post-6495102
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K