Thermal time scale in tubular flow reactors

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on estimating the thermal time scale for reagents in a tubular reactor (PTFE tubes, ID: 2mm) used for nanoparticle synthesis. To calculate the time it takes for the reagents to reach the furnace temperature, one must find the thermal capacity of the fluid and multiply it by the thermal resistance of the tube to determine the Time Constant, which is then multiplied by 5. The Biot Number (Bi) is crucial for validating the lumped system analysis, with a Bi value of 0.9 indicating that the method may not be entirely applicable. The calculated thermal time constant is approximately 3 seconds, leading to an estimated time of around 17 seconds to reach the final temperature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermal conductivity and heat capacity
  • Familiarity with the Biot Number (Bi) and its significance in heat transfer
  • Knowledge of thermal resistance in tubular systems
  • Basic principles of heat transfer in fluid dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the calculation of thermal time constants in fluid systems
  • Explore the implications of the Biot Number in heat transfer analysis
  • Study the effects of convective and radiative heat transfer in tubular reactors
  • Investigate modeling techniques for thermal barriers in fluid dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Engineers and researchers involved in nanoparticle synthesis, thermal analysis, and fluid dynamics, particularly those working with tubular reactors and heat transfer calculations.

MSM
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
So if I have a tubular reactor for nanoparticle synthesis (PTFE tubes ID:2mm). The tubes are heated in a furnace. liquid Reagents at room temperature are pumped by a syringe pump and directed toward the furnace. The reagents decompose to form nanoparticles once they reach the steady-state furnace temperature. How can I estimate how long it takes for the reagents to to reach the set temperature in the furnace once they enter the furnace?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
To Estimate:

Find the thermal capacity of the fluid.
Multiply by the thermal resistance of the tube.
This will give you the Time Constant for the heating process. (the time it takes to reach 63% of final temperature)
Multiply by 5.

Cheers,
Tom

p.s. If you are familiar with electrical circuits, the equivalent is a series RC being charged by a voltage source.

p.p.s. You can use this same approach in your previous thread regarding a continuously flowing fluid. It won't be exact (the calculated time will be too short) but is at least a starting point for low flow rates.
 
Last edited:
Tom.G said:
To Estimate:

Find the thermal capacity of the fluid.
Multiply by the thermal resistance of the tube.
This will give you the Time Constant for the heating process. (the time it takes to reach 63% of final temperature)
Multiply by 5.

Cheers,
Tom

p.s. If you are familiar with electrical circuits, the equivalent is a series RC being charged by a voltage source.

p.p.s. You can use this same approach in your previous thread regarding a continuously flowing fluid. It won't be exact (the calculated time will be too short) but is at least a starting point for low flow rates.
I tried the lumped system analysis, but my understanding is that for this method to be valid, Biot Number (Bi) has to be less than 0.1 (Bi<0.1).

Now consider a fluid with thermal conductivity k=0.14 W/m K, and heat capacity Cp= 2500 J/kg K, and density of 780 kg/m3.
Now for long pipes, Nu=3.68, and with a tube internal diameter of 2 mm, I get a heat transfer coefficient of 257 W/m2 K. This gives us a Bi=0.9. Now with this information , I get a thermal time constant of ~3 s-1. and t~17 seconds to reach final temperature. Does this seem reasonable? because I expected few seconds or lower

In this case, can I still use the method you suggested?
 
Last edited:
Well you got much deeper into it than I ever did! We could start a long Q&A on this but a better bet is to get the attention of those more versed in the 'non-common' situations.

Let's see if paging @Chestermiller gets better input for you.

If I understand the numbers you supplied, the thermal conductivity of the liquid is extremely low with a moderately high thermal capacity. If that is the case, how about modeling the liquid as a solid thermal barrier with an equivalent 'perfect' (zero size, infinite conductivity) thermal mass at the center?

As I understand the Biot number, it considers convective heat transfer at the surface. With the temperatures you have wouldn't radiative transfer also be significant?

Cheers,
Tom
 
Tom.G said:
Well you got much deeper into it than I ever did! We could start a long Q&A on this but a better bet is to get the attention of those more versed in the 'non-common' situations.

Let's see if paging @Chestermiller gets better input for you.

If I understand the numbers you supplied, the thermal conductivity of the liquid is extremely low with a moderately high thermal capacity. If that is the case, how about modeling the liquid as a solid thermal barrier with an equivalent 'perfect' (zero size, infinite conductivity) thermal mass at the center?

As I understand the Biot number, it considers convective heat transfer at the surface. With the temperatures you have wouldn't radiative transfer also be significant?

Cheers,
Tom
See my response to the other thread. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/heat-transfer-in-thin-tubes.1003289/#post-6495102
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
941
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K