Thermocouple in inductive surrounding

  • Thread starter Thread starter roro36
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermocouple
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of measuring temperature in the vicinity of an induction furnace, specifically focusing on the interference caused by electromagnetic induction on thermocouples. Participants explore various sensor options and techniques to mitigate interference while ensuring accurate temperature readings of water in pipes associated with the furnace.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the problem of significant electromagnetic interference affecting thermocouple readings, suggesting that moving the sensors further away may lead to inaccurate temperature measurements due to cooling.
  • Another participant proposes using two thermocouples with opposing orientations and a difference amplifier to potentially cancel out interference, or alternatively using a PT100 thermometer with oscillating current to reduce interference.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that depending on the electromagnetic interference (EMI) levels, traditional thermocouples or RTDs may be ineffective, and questions the type of thermocouple reader being used and its adjustable settings.
  • One participant mentions the possibility of using fiber optic sensors as an alternative to thermo-electric sensors, noting their success in building optical temperature sensors despite their complexity and cost.
  • Another participant shares their experience with a specific thermocouple card that did not perform well and inquires about other sensor options suitable for high inductance environments.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the effectiveness of different temperature sensing methods in high EMI environments, with no consensus on a single best solution. Multiple competing views on sensor types and configurations remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various sensor options and configurations without reaching a definitive conclusion on their effectiveness under the specific conditions presented. There are also references to the limitations of certain thermocouple readers and the potential need for adjustments in settings.

roro36
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
We use induction furnaces to melt aluminium. I want to be able to read the temperature of the water in the pipe flowing in and out of the furnace. I am looking at a spot about 3m away but the induction from the furnace registers about 20mV on a scope which the thermocouples equate to 400V roughly.

If I move the thermocouples away, the water temp may have cooled too much and I still won't get an accurate reading.

Can anyone suggest a possible solution in either minimising the interference or using another sensor?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I suppose you meant something like 400C and not volts. It depends on how much electronics you are willing to get into. There are lots of options. One would be to use two thermocouples of opposing orientation and twist the lead wires together, then use a difference amplifier. With a bit of luck the interference cancels. Another way would be a simple PT100 thermometer that should give you much more signal and using an oscillating current to read the temperature would reduce interference even further. shielding might help. Really there are too many options to name and I am sure that there are ready made sensors that will work.
 
Depending on the EMI that's being generated by the furnace a thermocouple or an RTD may not work at all no matter how hard you try. What type of thermocouple reader are you using? Do you have the option of adjusting the integration and/or acquisition time? What kind of accuracy are you looking for?

One option is just to ditch thermo-electric sensors all together and use something like fiber optic sensors. I've built optical temperature sensors from scratch and have had great success but they are can be difficult to build and very expensive to buy.
 
I'm using delts's dvp series thermocouple card, which was a failure. I can use a pt card or a normal analogu input an use somehing like an lm35? Are there any other options under this high inductance field that surrounds the probes?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K