Thermodynamics - Double U Tube Manometer with 2 Closed Ends

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a thermodynamics problem involving a double U tube manometer with two closed ends, specifically analyzing the pressure difference between fresh water and sea water in parallel pipelines. Participants explore the implications of closed ends, the role of air and oil columns, and the application of pressure equations in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about how to find an initial pressure due to both ends of the manometer being closed, suggesting that an open end would simplify the analysis.
  • Another participant advises that an absolute pressure is not necessary for finding a pressure difference and suggests assigning an arbitrary pressure to facilitate calculations.
  • A participant shares their calculations using the \(\rho g h\) equation but doubts their correctness and seeks further guidance.
  • There is a mention of a more general version of the \(\rho g h\) equation that does not require atmospheric pressure, indicating a potential alternative approach.
  • One participant suggests a method of adding and subtracting \(\rho g h\) terms while moving through the manometer to find the pressure difference, noting that the air column's effect is often negligible due to its low density.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that an absolute pressure is not needed for the analysis, but there is no consensus on the specific calculations or methods to apply, as some participants express confusion and seek clarification.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the potential neglect of the air column due to its low density, but this assumption is not universally accepted, and the implications of using oil instead of air are also raised without resolution.

ynotbathe
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Thermodynamics -- Double U Tube Manometer with 2 Closed Ends

Homework Statement


GIVEN:
Fresh water and sea water in parallel horizontal pipelines are connected to each other by a double U tube manometer.

Density of sea water is 1035 kg/m^3
Density of air is 1.2 kg/m^3
Standard temp and pressure

A link to the relevant diagram is here:
https://engineering.purdue.edu/ME200/Fall%202009/SpecialProblems/SpecialProblems3-5.pdf"

FIND:
a) Pressure difference between the pipelines
b) Can the air column be ignored in your analysis?
c) If the air is replaced with oil of specific gravity 0.72, then what is the pressure difference in kPa between the two pipelines? Can the oil column be neglected?

Homework Equations


P-Patm = rho * g * h of liquid

The Attempt at a Solution


The problem I am running into is that each end of the manometer is closed so I'm not sure how to find an initial pressure. If one end were open to atmospheric pressure I think I could find the pressure difference and work my way back, if that makes sense. However since both ends are closed "bulbs" of sea and fresh water, I'm not really sure where to start.

Right now I have labeled the point where the fresh water meets the mercury as point a, the point in the mercury at that same level as point b, the point where the air meets the sea water as point d, and the point at that same level as point c. I am thinking that I can then use the rho*g*l equation somehow, I'm just unclear as to how since Patm isn't evident. Pressure at point a and point be should be equal though, and pressure at point c and point d should be equal.

I am thinking that there is some sort of equivalency I can use or something... I have the entire manometer hookup as my system but perhaps that is where I am going wrong.

I am sorry I don't have much worked out, if anyone can even give me some hints as to a starting point I would appreciate it greatly.

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Hi ynotbathe, welcome to PF. You don't need an absolute pressure, because you're only asked to find a pressure difference. Go ahead and assign a pressure p_0 to any of the points you mentioned; it's going to disappear in the final analysis. Although you've given one version of the \rho g h equation, there's a more general version that doesn't necessitate using P_\mathrm{atm}. Does this help?
 


could you explain how you went about doing this problem? I am a little lost
 


Mapes said:
Hi ynotbathe, welcome to PF. You don't need an absolute pressure, because you're only asked to find a pressure difference. Go ahead and assign a pressure p_0 to any of the points you mentioned; it's going to disappear in the final analysis. Although you've given one version of the \rho g h equation, there's a more general version that doesn't necessitate using P_\mathrm{atm}. Does this help?

This is what I did, but I'm pretty sure it's wrong:

Pa = Pb = arbitrary constant = rho*g*h = 13570 kg/m^3 (density of mercury) * 9.8 m/s^2 (gravitational constant) * .1 m (difference in height) = 13298.6 Pa

Pc = Pd = arbitrary constant = rho*g*h = 1.2 kg/m^3 (density of air) * 9.8 m/s^2 (gravitational constant) * .4 m (difference in height) = 4.707 Pa

In addition to not thinking these numbers are right, I'm not really sure where to go from here. Any hints or suggestions to what I'm doing wrong?

Thanks!
 


The \rho g h equation is for finding the difference in pressure between two points. Lacking an absolute reference, as is the case here, you can only find a pressure relative to an arbitrary point. So pick an arbitrary point -- say, one of the two pipes -- and work your way to the other pipe.
 


u can try this method. Start with one of the enclosed bulb (eg; P1) add the "rho"gh terms when u go down the tube and subtract the terms when you go up the tube until you reach the other enclosed bulb. The effect of air air column is usually neglected in most problem as the density is small and so, the "rho"gh term for the air column is assumed to be zero.Try this link, http://www.fuzzyturtle.net/TDEC/tdec202/hw01.pdf"
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K