Thermodynamics: finding work done

AI Thread Summary
In a closed system, 0.4kg of gas at 374K undergoes isothermal and reversible expansion from 1MPa to 300kPa, prompting a discussion on calculating the work done. Participants express uncertainty about the correct approach, with one seeking guidance on the differential work equation and its relation to external pressure. Clarification is provided that the problem requires integration of PdV for accurate results, countering the notion that it can be solved with basic algebra. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between pressure and volume changes in thermodynamic processes. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexity of the problem and the need for a solid grasp of thermodynamic principles.
Frozen
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a closed system 0.4kg of gas at 374K is expanded isothermally and reversibly from 1MPa pressure to 300kPa. Given that Cv = 718j/kg and R = 287j/kg, determine the work done.[/B]

Homework Equations


Not sure? I guess W = p*V?

The Attempt at a Solution


I honestly don't know how to solve this one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
NB: I don't want anyone to do this for me, in case anyone thinks I'm trying to cheat. I just want someone to point me in the right direction because I honestly don't know where to begin figuring this out.
 
What is the equation for the differential work dW done by a gas on its surroundings in terms of the external force per unit area Pext and the differential change in volume dV? For a reversible process, how is the external force per unit area Pext related to the gas pressure?

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
What is the equation for the differential work dW done by a gas on its surroundings in terms of the external force per unit area Pext and the differential change in volume dV? For a reversible process, how is the external force per unit area Pext related to the gas pressure?

Chet
Chet, I'm sure this is an algebra based physics question, not calculus.
 
DrewHizzy said:
Chet, I'm sure this is an algebra based physics question, not calculus.
Really. What makes you think so? This problem can not be solved correctly unless PdV is integrated, or the person has a formula for the result of the PdV integration.

Chet
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top