Thermodynamics - Piston-and-Steam-Table-Type Question

In summary: No need. It will all play out when the problem is actually solved, such that the final specific volume and final specific internal energy are made good on.Hey guys, thanks a lot for the replies!
  • #1
LostStudent5
7
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
An insulated cylinder containing water has a piston held by a pin. The water is initially saturated vapour at 65°C and a volume of 5L. The piston has a total mass of 10kg, its area is 0.003 m^2 and the atmospheric pressure is 100kPa. The pin is then released, allowing the piston to move. Determine the final pressure and temperature of the water assuming the process to be adiabatic.

Homework Equations


[/B]
Sum of forces = 0
F = PA
W = mg

The Attempt at a Solution



At equilibrium:
P2 *A = mg + Patm *A
P2 = mg/A + Patm = 10*9.8/0.003 + 100*10^3 = 132666.6667 Pa = 1.326666667 bar

That's the first part done. Now I'm stuck at the second part - finding the final temperature of the water (T2). This is what I've got so far:

V1 = 5 L = 0.005 m^3 (given)
v1 = 6.201 m^3/kg (using the Steam Table)
m1 = V1/v1 = 0.005/6.201 = 0.00080632156 kg

P1 = 0.2501 (using the Steam Table)
Q12 = 0 (adiabatic; insulated)

However, I don't see how any of this is relevant to finding T2. Any help is much appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    3.4 KB · Views: 368
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
For an adiabatic process, what is the pressure-volume relationship for an ideal gas? Assume a quasi-static process (slowly-moving piston).
Then, determine the new pressure and solve for V, then use the ideal gas law relating p, V and T.

(Chet, please critique if necessary).
 
  • #3
rude man said:
For an adiabatic process, what is the pressure-volume relationship for an ideal gas? Assume a quasi-static process (slowly-moving piston).
Then, determine the new pressure and solve for V, then use the ideal gas law relating p, V and T.

(Chet, please critique if necessary).
This is an irreversible process, so the ideal gas law can't be used. Let V2 be the final volume. In terms of V2, how much work did the gas do? In terms of V2, what was the final specific volume? In terms of V2, how much work was done by the gas per unit mass of gas? In terms of V2, what was the final internal energy per unit mass of the gas? (The work done by the gas was the same as if the external pressure were constant at 1.327 bars).
 
  • Like
Likes LostStudent5
  • #4
Chestermiller said:
This is an irreversible process, so the ideal gas law can't be used. Let V2 be the final volume. In terms of V2, how much work did the gas do? In terms of V2, what was the final specific volume? In terms of V2, how much work was done by the gas per unit mass of gas? In terms of V2, what was the final internal energy per unit mass of the gas? (The work done by the gas was the same as if the external pressure were constant at 1.327 bars).
Thanks Chet!b
But if you then get the final U, don't you have to assume an ideal gas to get T?
rudy
 
  • #5
rude man said:
Thanks Chet!b
But if you then get the final U, don't you have to assume an ideal gas to get T?
rudy
Oh wait, the quality will be between 0 and 100%, won't it? NM.
 
  • #6
rude man said:
Oh wait, the quality will be between 0 and 100%, won't it? NM.
I think maybe it's going to be superheated.
 
  • Like
Likes LostStudent5
  • #7
Chestermiller said:
I think maybe it's going to be superheated.
If it's already saturated vapor and then gets compressed, wouldn't it be either within the mixed-phase area (on a p-V curve, where p determines T) or even liquid?

Come to think of it, the orientation of the cylinder is not given but I assumed the piston was on top.

Should we pursue this privately?
 
  • #8
rude man said:
If it's already saturated vapor and then gets compressed, wouldn't it be either within the mixed-phase area (on a p-V curve, where p determines T) or even liquid?

Come to think of it, the orientation of the cylinder is not given but I assumed the piston was on top.

Should we pursue this privately?
No need. It will all play out when the problem is actually solved, such that the final specific volume and final specific internal energy are made good on.
 
  • Like
Likes LostStudent5
  • #9
Hey guys, thanks a lot for the replies!

Chestermiller said:
This is an irreversible process, so the ideal gas law can't be used. Let V2 be the final volume. In terms of V2, how much work did the gas do?

Q-W = DeltaU
Q = 0 since the process is adiabatic
h = u+PV -> u = h-PV

Therefore:
W = -DeltaU = m(u1-u2) = m (h1 - P1V1 - h2 +P2V2) (1)

Is this right? h2 is unknown...

Chestermiller said:
In terms of V2, what was the final specific volume?

v2 = V2/m

Chestermiller said:
In terms of V2, how much work was done by the gas per unit mass of gas?

From equation (1):
w = h1 - P1V1 - h2 +P2V2

Chestermiller said:
In terms of V2, what was the final internal energy per unit mass of the gas? (The work done by the gas was the same as if the external pressure were constant at 1.327 bars).
Sorry I don't really understand this part. What I got is:

u2 = h2 - P2V2

but h2 is unknown.

I can confirm that the final state of water is in superheated vapour form, according to the answers.
 
  • #10
LostStudent5 said:
Hey guys, thanks a lot for the replies!
Q-W = DeltaU
Q = 0 since the process is adiabatic
h = u+PV -> u = h-PV

Does your steam tables not have internal energies tabulated, only enthalpies? If so, see below.
Therefore:
W = -DeltaU = m(u1-u2) = m (h1 - P1V1 - h2 +P2V2) (1)

Is this right? h2 is unknown...

No.

##W=(V_2-0.005)(132.7)## kJ

##\Delta U=-W=-(V_2-0.005)(132.7)##

##\Delta H=-(V_2-0.005)(132.7)+132.7V_2-(25.01)(0.005)=(107.7)(0.005)## kJ

v2 = V2/m
Correct.
From equation (1):
w = h1 - P1V1 - h2 +P2V2Sorry I don't really understand this part. What I got is:

u2 = h2 - P2V2

but h2 is unknown.
Consider this:

$$h_2=h_1+\frac{\Delta H}{m}=h_1+\frac{(107.7)(0.005)}{0.000806}$$

So, you now know the final pressure and the final enthalpy per unit mass.
 
  • Like
Likes LostStudent5
  • #11
Chestermiller said:
Does your steam tables not have internal energies tabulated, only enthalpies? If so, see below.
It does, but it's in the form of uf and ug. I can work out u1 with the given data, but not u2 since its state is unknown.
Chestermiller said:
##W=(V_2-0.005)(132.7)## kJ
This is the only part that I do not understand. Why is the pressure constant here? W=PΔV only applies to isobaric processes. P2 has a magnitude of 1.32 b while P1 has a magnitude of 0.2501 b, which I have already determined in the OP. Clearly there is a pressure difference so why are you using the formula for work for an isobaric process?

Anyway, I got the correct answer thanks to your help. Just don't understand the isobaric part!
 
  • #12
LostStudent5 said:
It does, but it's in the form of uf and ug. I can work out u1 with the given data, but not u2 since its state is unknown.

This is the only part that I do not understand. Why is the pressure constant here? W=PΔV only applies to isobaric processes. P2 has a magnitude of 1.32 b while P1 has a magnitude of 0.2501 b, which I have already determined in the OP. Clearly there is a pressure difference so why are you using the formula for work for an isobaric process?
My question too, Chet! Why is pressure essentially constant and equal to the final equilibrium pressure? Otherwise I think I follow.
 
  • Like
Likes LostStudent5
  • #13
rude man said:
My question too, Chet! Why is pressure essentially constant and equal to the final equilibrium pressure? Otherwise I think I follow.
In an irreversible compression like this, the gas pressure within the cylinder is non-uniform spatially, and, in addition, viscous stresses within the gas contribute to the force per unit area exerted by the gas on the piston face. It is this force by the gas that does the work on its surroundings. So, the ideal gas law cannot be applied to get the gas force on the piston face.

In addition, in this problem, the gas force on the piston face clearly varies with time. So, how does one proceed? Well, we if we apply Newton's 2nd law to the piston, we obtain:
$$F(t)-mg-p_aA=m\frac{dv}{dt}$$where F(t) is the force exerted by the gas on the piston at time t, m is the mass of the piston, A is the piston cross sectional area, and ##p_a## is the air pressure. If we multiply this equation by the piston v=dx/dt, we obtain the mechanical energy balance equation: $$F\frac{dx}{dt}-mg\frac{dx}{dt}-p_aA\frac{dx}{dt}=mv\frac{dv}{dt}=m\frac{d(v^2/2)}{dt}$$
If we integrate this equation with respect to t, we obtain:
$$\int_{0}^{x(t)}F(x)dx=\left(\frac{mg}{A}+p_a\right)(V(t)-V(0))+m\frac{v^2(t)}{2}$$
The left hand side of this equation is the work done by the gas on the piston between time zero and time t, and the last term on the right hand side of this equation is the kinetic energy of the piston at time t. At relatively short times, the piston will overshoot the equilibrium position and oscillate up an down, so its kinetic energy will be varying with time. But, as time progresses, the oscillation of the piston will be damped out by viscous dissipation caused by the viscous stresses within the gas. (There is no need for actual friction between the piston and the cylinder to bring about this damping, and, in this analysis, we assume that the contact between the piston and the cylinder is frictionless). So, at very long times, we will have:
$$W=\int_{0}^{\infty}F(x)dx=\left(\frac{mg}{A}+p_a\right)(V(\infty)-V(0))$$
But this equation is exactly the same relationship we would have obtained if we had assumed that the gas force on the piston face were constant at its final equilibrium value throughout the entire expansion/compression.
 
  • Like
Likes LostStudent5
  • #14
Thank you so much Chest! Everything is clear as day now :)
 
  • #15
Or perhaps a simpler approach, math-wise at least:
we have
ma = Ap(t) - Apa - mg
where m = mass of piston
a = acceleration of piston, initially negative (call "up" the "+" direction)
A = area of piston
pa = atmospheric pressure
p(t) = instantaneous gas pressure after pin is removed at t=0.
Now we invoke d'Alembert's principle, which just states that the term ma can be considered another force ("inertia force") = -ma. Then Σforces = 0:
-ma + Ap(t) - Apa - mg = 0
where now -ma + Ap(t) is the total instantaneous force on the piston in the up direction, and always > 0; and
-Apa - mg is the force on the piston in the down direction, and always < 0.

i.e -ma + Ap(t) always equals Apa + mg, including when the piston finally comes to rest so that a = 0; then Ap(∞) = Ap2 = Apa + mg.

Therefore, the effective force, including the inertia force, in the up direction, due obviously entirely to the gas, is always Ap2.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
rude man said:
Or perhaps a simpler approach, math-wise at least:
we have
ma = Ap(t) - Apa - mg
where m = mass of piston
a = acceleration of piston, initially negative (call "up" the "+" direction)
A = area of piston
pa = atmospheric pressure
p(t) = instantaneous gas pressure after pin is removed at t=0.
Now we invoke d'Alembert's principle, which just states that the term ma can be considered another force = -ma. Then Σforces = 0:
-ma + Ap(t) - Apa - mg = 0
where now -ma + Ap(t) is the total instantaneous force on the piston in the up direction, and always > 0; and
-Apa - mg is the force on the piston in the down direction, and always < 0.
i.e -ma + Ap(t) always equals Apa + mg.
But we have previously shown that Apa + mg = Ap2.
Therefore, the gas pressure is always p2.
qed
Hi rude man.

Maybe this works for you, but it doesn't work for me. In order for this to work for me, it still needs to show that the integral of the left hand side with respect to the displacement is equal to the integral of Ap(t) with respect to the displacement (the work W), which means that it needs to show that the integral of a(t) with respect to the displacement is zero. But that's basically what my analysis in post #13 showed.

Chet
 
  • #17
Chestermiller said:
Hi rude man.

Maybe this works for you, but it doesn't work for me. In order for this to work for me, it still needs to show that the integral of the left hand side with respect to the displacement is equal to the integral of Ap(t) with respect to the displacement (the work W), which means that it needs to show that the integral of a(t) with respect to the displacement is zero. But that's basically what my analysis in post #13 showed.

Chet
:frown:
 
  • #18
5 months later, I just can't seem to let this one go:
OK, d'Alembert did not this time meet with universal approbation, although I still think my argument was valid.
So, how about this:

m = piston mass
A = area of piston
pa = atmospheric pressure

Looking just at the piston, it starts with zero motion and zero net applied force (the pin offsetting gravity plus atmospheric pressure). Initial volume and pressure are V1 and p1.

Then, the pin is pulled and after some motion including possible oscillation the piston rests again at a new volume V2. Barring friction this means that the total work done on the piston by all forces (gas, atmosph. & gravity) must then be zero.

Therefore, the work done by the gas = W = -(work done by the outside), the "outside" being atmosphere plus gravity.
But the latter is merely (pa + mg/A)(V1 - V2) = -W
then ΔU = - W = (pa + mg/A)(V1 - V2) , and
ΔH = H2 - H1
= ΔU + (pa + mg/A)V2 - p1V1
= (pa + mg/A)(V1 - V2) + (pa + mg/A)V2 - p1V1
= V1(pa + mg/A - p1)
yielding H2 and T2 from the steam tables.
 
  • #19
Yes. This all looks correct. But, one just can't say that, during the entire expansion, the force exerted by the gas on the piston is constant at ##mg+p_aA##. My point was that, in the end, the work done by the gas is the same as if it were.

I think we are in agreement now?
 
  • #20
Chestermiller said:
Yes. This all looks correct. But, one just can't say that, during the entire expansion, the force exerted by the gas on the piston is constant at ##mg+p_aA##. My point was that, in the end, the work done by the gas is the same as if it were.

I think we are in agreement now?
Chet, I always agreed with your derivation. I just tried to find a simpler derivation. And I still think the d'Alembert approach is also valid. But what's a few differing approaches between friends? :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller

What is thermodynamics?

Thermodynamics is a branch of physics that deals with the study of energy and its transformations within a system. It also focuses on the relationship between different forms of energy and how they affect the behavior of matter.

What is a piston-and-steam-table-type question?

A piston-and-steam-table-type question is a type of problem in thermodynamics that involves a piston, which is a movable boundary in a system, and a steam table, which is a table that provides thermodynamic properties of water and steam at different temperatures and pressures.

What are some common applications of piston-and-steam-table-type questions?

Some common applications of piston-and-steam-table-type questions include the study of steam engines, gas turbines, and refrigeration systems. These types of questions are also commonly used in engineering and physics courses to help students understand the principles of thermodynamics.

What are some key concepts to understand when solving a piston-and-steam-table-type question?

In order to solve a piston-and-steam-table-type question, it is important to understand concepts such as the laws of thermodynamics, heat transfer, work, and energy conservation. It is also important to have a good understanding of the properties of water and steam, as provided in the steam table.

How do you approach solving a piston-and-steam-table-type question?

In order to solve a piston-and-steam-table-type question, it is important to first understand the given problem and identify the relevant variables. Then, using the laws of thermodynamics and the properties of water and steam, you can apply the appropriate equations and solve for the unknown variables. It is also helpful to draw a diagram to visualize the system and its boundaries.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
728
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
802
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
3K

Back
Top