Thermodynamics Question About Steam

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the modeling of steam flow through a pipe to fill a cylinder in the context of designing a steam engine. Participants explore the dynamics of steam movement, pressure considerations, and the effects of pipe dimensions on flow rates, particularly at varying RPMs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the time required for steam at 500 degrees F and 1000 psi to fill a specific volume, questioning the applicability of mathematical modeling and Steam Tables.
  • Another participant suggests that the inquiry may relate to a school assignment, seeking clarification on the intent behind the question.
  • A participant clarifies that the goal is to characterize a steam engine design to determine its RPM limit.
  • Questions are raised about the initial conditions in the tube and cylinder before steam flow begins.
  • The original poster describes the setup involving a steam valve and the implications of "steam starvation" at higher RPMs, identifying key variables such as flow limits through the tubing and the fill time for the cylinder.
  • A participant confirms that modeling is possible, mentioning the use of a Moody chart for calculating pressure drop versus flow rate, but notes that steady state flow conditions are only applicable at low speeds.
  • Suggestions are made for simplifying assumptions to facilitate calculations, including treating the valve opening as instantaneous and ignoring certain pressure drops, while emphasizing the iterative nature of refining the model based on results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the modeling approach and the assumptions necessary for calculations. There is no consensus on the best method to model the system, and the discussion remains open to different interpretations and methodologies.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity introduced by the long tube and the need for iterative calculations, indicating that assumptions may significantly affect the outcomes of the modeling process.

jesmitter
Messages
3
Reaction score
2
How long does it take for 500 degree F - 1000 psi steam to move through 24" of 3/16 ID pipe and fill a 1 cubic inch volume cylinder to 1000 psi? Can it be modeled mathematically or with the help of Steam Tables?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
:welcome:

That sounds like a school assignment. Is it?
 
No, I am trying to characterize a single cylinder steam engine that I want to design and build to see what the RPM limit will be.
 
What is in the tube and cylinder before you start?
 
The 3/16" tube is connected to an electronically controlled steam valve at the cylinder which will open at top dead center of the piston inside the cylinder. So, the tube will theoretically be filled with steam produced by the boiler (assume an unlimited steam supply), at least for the first cycle. Then as the RPM increases, the tubing will reach its limit caused by the diameter of the tubing causing "steam Starvation". In addition, the cylinder has a fill time that may not be satisfied by the amount of steam that the tubing can supply at the higher RPM. These are the unknown variables I'm trying to figure out -
1. What is the flow/volume limit through 3/16" stainless steel tubing?
2. What is the "fill time" required for the cylinder to completely fill with steam at full pressure (1000 psi)?
 
Last edited:
Yes, it can be modeled. You can calculate pressure drop vs flow rate through pipe for any Newtonian fluid, gas or liquid, using a Moody chart (search the term). However, that calculation only works for steady state flow. Your application will only have steady state flow at extremely low speed.

At any speed over about 10 to 100 RPM, a flow calculation will need to include the time to move the valve from closed to open, the volume of the tube, and the position of the piston. I once wrote a simulation for a high speed air cylinder. That simulation accurately predicted acceleration, deceleration, and presence/absence of bouncing. The simulation treated the valve as a variable orifice, and the connecting tube as a dead volume lumped with the piston position. Your case has a very long tube, which adds a complicating factor.

I suggest start with simplifying assumptions:
1) Valve opens instantly.
2) Piston at TDC, not moving.
3) Ignore pressure drop down the length of the tube.
4) Valve starts to open at TDC.
5) Ignore the speed of sound in the steam.

Then the only pressure drop in the system is the ##C_V## or equivalent orifice area of the valve. Then you can calculate the initial flow rate through the valve. Calculate the time for the downstream pressure to increase about 10%, then recalculate the flow rate at that time step until downstream pressure is almost equal to supply pressure. This can be done with a spreadsheet.

When you get that iterative calculation working, it's easy to add sophistication. Based on your results, decide which simplifying assumption you want to remove. If, for example, the time to fill the tube with steam is about equal to the valve opening time, that would be a good variable to add to your model.

IMPORTANT: Start as simple as possible, then add only one variable at a time.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K