Chemistry Thermodynamics: Reduction Potential question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a question regarding reduction potential in thermodynamics, where participants debate the correct answer between options a and b. One participant argues that the answer key is incorrect because element Y has a similar reduction potential to element B, suggesting that a negative or less positive reduction potential is necessary for a good reducing agent. Confusion arises over whether the question is asking to reduce B or to oxidize BH2, with some interpreting it as needing an electron donor rather than an acceptor. The clarity of the question is questioned, particularly regarding the inclusion of element Y as a potential oxidant. Ultimately, the ambiguity in the question leads to differing interpretations among participants.
TytoAlba95
Messages
132
Reaction score
19
Homework Statement
NA
Relevant Equations
NA
20200729_223445.jpg

The answer key says the correct option should be a, but I think it should be b. Because Y has a reduction potential same as the element B.

An element is a good reducing agent only if its reduction potential is negative or less positive.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Then why have you chosen the most positive one?

The question seems unclear. What are you being asked to do - reduce B or oxidise BH2? I read it as reducing B, but then you want an electron donor, not an acceptor. Have I misunderstood?
 
I think it is asking which out of the three can oxidize BH2. In that case, I think (b) is the correct option.
Thanks for pointing out, I got confused after reading the question. I really is unclear.

But if they are asking for the oxidant, shouldn't Y element be excluded?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top