This is Not the Petition you are Looking For

  • Thread starter Thread starter russ_watters
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The White House officially responded to a petition advocating for the construction of a Death Star by 2016, stating that such a project is not feasible or aligned with national priorities. The estimated cost of over $850 quadrillion is cited as a significant barrier, especially in light of efforts to reduce the national deficit. The administration also emphasized that it does not support the destruction of planets and pointed out the inherent design flaws of the Death Star, which could be exploited by smaller spacecraft. The response humorously noted the existence of the International Space Station as a current example of space infrastructure. The discussion then shifted to debates about the technical aspects of starships and starfighters, with participants engaging in lighthearted banter about the capabilities of various spacecraft in the Star Wars universe.
Messages
23,692
Reaction score
11,130
OFFICIAL WHITE HOUSE RESPONSE TO
Secure resources and funding, and begin construction of a Death Star by 2016.
This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For
By Paul Shawcross

The Administration shares your desire for job creation and a strong national defense, but a Death Star isn't on the horizon. Here are a few reasons:

-The construction of the Death Star has been estimated to cost more than $850,000,000,000,000,000. We're working hard to reduce the deficit, not expand it.
-The Administration does not support blowing up planets.
-Why would we spend countless taxpayer dollars on a Death Star with a fundamental flaw that can be exploited by a one-man starship?
-However, look carefully (here's how) and you'll notice something already floating in the sky -- that's no Moon, it's a Space Station! Yes, we already have a giant, football field-sized International Space Station in orbit around the Earth...
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/pe...d-begin-construction-death-star-2016/wlfKzFkN

A starfighter is not a starship, but otherwise, well done!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
russ_watters said:
A starfighter is not a starship

Sure it is. Luke took one from Hoth all the way to Dagobah.
 
Without a hyperdrive? I find that hard to believe.
 
ISS...pffft. When they can vaporise Alderaan, then they can talk. :rolleyes:
 
russ_watters said:
Without a hyperdrive? I find that hard to believe.

That is why you fail. :P

X-wings do have hyperdrives:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-wing#Depiction
Lacking an on-board navigation computer, they rely on an astromech droid to calculate hyperspace jumps. The presence of a hyperdrive and deflector shields differentiate the X-wing from the Empire's TIE fighters
 
Last edited:
On the other hand, anything smaller than a planet, that would generate the energy required to blow up said planet, would instead blow itself up.
 
The construction of the Death Star has been estimated to cost more than $850,000,000,000,000,000.
That's if the govt builds it. The free market could make it for $9.95.
Death Star.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
38
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
10K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Back
Top