I Thorne's error in explaining gravitational time dilation

Click For Summary
Thorne's explanation of gravitational time dilation in "Black Holes & Time Warps" uses a thought experiment involving two clocks in free fall from different heights. He asserts that the ceiling clock, dropped earlier, moves faster towards the floor clock, causing the floor clock to perceive the ceiling clock's light pulses as arriving more closely spaced. Critics argue that this explanation lacks rigor, as the book is not a peer-reviewed source or textbook, making it unsuitable for serious scientific discussion. The conversation highlights the distinction between popular science literature and academic standards. The thread concludes with a reminder of the need for credible sources in scientific discourse.
Guillermo Navas
Messages
9
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
Error in explaining gravitational time dilation using the equivalence principle and the Doppler effect.
In Box 2.4 of the book "Black Holes & Time Warps" by Kip S. Thorne, he explains gravitational time dilation using the equivalence principle. For this he uses an experiment thought analogous to the one used by Einstein in 1911 to postulate the existence of a gravitational Doppler shift, but slightly modifying the initial conditions.

Thorne's thought experiment is as follows: consider two identical clocks that are dropped in free fall into a gravitational field from different heights. Light pulses are sent from the highest clock to the lowest clock. The clock on the ceiling emits its first pulse of light when it begins its fall, while the lower clock begins its free fall when it receives the first pulse of light. The detailed explanation can be seen in the image on the Box 2.4 pages, Thorne says: “Because the ceiling clock was dropped before the floor clock, its downward speed is always greater than that of the floor clock (diagram b); that is, it moves toward the floor clock. This implies that the floor clock will see the ceiling clock’s light pulses Doppler-shifted (Box 2.3); that is, it will see them arrive more closely spaced in time than the time between its own ticks”.

Can you see which the error is?
 

Attachments

  • Thorne_girado.jpg
    Thorne_girado.jpg
    138.1 KB · Views: 152
Physics news on Phys.org
Guillermo Navas said:
the book "Black Holes & Time Warps" by Kip S. Thorne

...is not a textbook or peer-reviewed paper. It's a pop science book. So it's not a valid basis for PF discussion.

Thread closed.
 
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
673
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K