Thoughts on realistic model of electon Zitterbewegung

  • Thread starter Thread starter johne1618
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Model Thoughts
johne1618
Messages
368
Reaction score
0
Thoughts on "realistic" model of electon Zitterbewegung

Several researchers, for example David Hestenes, have a physical model of electron Zitterbewegung as a massless particle traveling at the velocity of light, c, around a circle of radius r.

This is my take on what this might imply.

Following de Broglie's conjecture, the orbital angular momentum of this massless particle is equal to hbar so we have:

m_e c r = hbar

m_e = hbar / c r

where m_e is the total mass/energy of the electron.

I understand that the Zitterbewegung frequency of the electron is:

w = 2 m c^2 / hbar

Following Hestenes' model above, the circular frequency w is given by:

w = c / r

Thus we find:

m = hbar / 2 c r

I was wondering if the above mass m can be pictured as representing the kinetic energy of the massless orbiting particle which makes up half the total mass/energy of the electron system.

John
 
Physics news on Phys.org


johne1618 said:
Several researchers, for example David Hestenes, have a physical model of electron Zitterbewegung as a massless particle traveling at the velocity of light, c, around a circle of radius r.

This is my take on what this might imply.

Following de Broglie's conjecture, the orbital angular momentum of this massless particle is equal to hbar so we have:

m_e c r = hbar

m_e = hbar / c r

where m_e is the total mass/energy of the electron.

I understand that the Zitterbewegung frequency of the electron is:

w = 2 m c^2 / hbar

Following Hestenes' model above, the circular frequency w is given by:

w = c / r

Thus we find:

m = hbar / 2 c r

I was wondering if the above mass m can be pictured as representing the kinetic energy of the massless orbiting particle which makes up half the total mass/energy of the electron system.

John
So Hestenes hypothesizes that "circular motion", "radius" and "orbiting" have a meaning at the scale of an electron. What could be the experimental support for such an assumption ?

When they worked together, J. A. Wheeler and R. P. Feynman took a quite opposite hypothesis, and showed that all the inertia of the electron (but alas not of the heavy ones, muon and tauon) came from the sum of advanced and retarded waves to and from the other electric charges. An external coupling.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Back
Top