Thread Title Smilies: Testing to See If It Works

  • Thread starter Thread starter tiny-tim
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around testing the functionality of smilies in forum threads. Participants express frustration that the smilies do not work as intended, referencing previous posts for context. There is a suggestion that the underlying theory behind the smilies could be flawed. One user humorously contemplates the possibility of obtaining a research grant for this testing. Overall, the thread highlights the challenges and uncertainties in implementing smilies in forum discussions.
tiny-tim
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
25,837
Reaction score
258
Just testing to see if it works for threads …

No … nothing happens … :cry:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it doesn't. c.f. Moonbear's post in your other thread.
 
… the theory could be wrong! …

cristo said:
No, it doesn't. c.f. Moonbear's post in your other thread.

This is physics - I have to test it for myself!

:smile: … the theory could be wrong! … :smile:

I wonder if I could get a research grant for this?
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
Back
Top