Three astronauts equipped with jetpacks

  • Thread starter Thread starter p14r
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Three astronauts are using jetpacks to push a 121 kg satellite in space, applying various forces at different angles. The net forces in the x and y directions were calculated, resulting in Fnet x of approximately 101.84 N and Fnet y of about -18.33 N. The total net force was determined to be -103.47 N, leading to an acceleration calculation using Fnet = ma. The final acceleration was found to be -0.85 m/s², but clarification was needed regarding the use of the negative sign for magnitude. It was confirmed that magnitudes should be unsigned, resolving the confusion.
p14r
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Three astronauts equipped with jetpacks are pushing a satellite, having a mass of 121kg, through space. The forces being exerted on the satellite are F1=31.8N at an angle of 31.0 degrees above the horizontal (θ1), F2=40.0N at 60.2 degrees below the horizontal (θ2), and F3=54.7N along the horizontal.

What is the magnitude of the satellite's acceleration?

So I tried to solve it by adding all the FnetX, and Fnet Y

Fnet x= 31.8 cos 31 + 54.7 + 40.0 cos 60.2
= 27.2579 + 54.7 + 19.8789584
= 101.8368786 N

Fnet y= 31.8 sin 31 - 40.0 sin 60.2
= 16.37821 - 34.71061813
= -18.332408 N

tan θ = 101.8368786 / -18.332408
θ = -79.79506177

sin θ = Fnet x/ Fnet
sin (-79.79506177) = 101.8368786/ Fnet
Fnet = -103.47 N

Fnet = ma
a = Fnet/m
a = -103.4737987 N/121 kg
a = -0.85 m/s^2

But apparently it's wrong, can someone help please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
p14r said:
Fnet = ma
a = Fnet/m
a = -103.4737987 N/121 kg
a = -0.85 m/s^2

But apparently it's wrong, can someone help please?
Did you include the minus sign in your answer? They wanted the magnitude of the acceleration.
 
Yup i did, so i shouldn't enter the negative sign?
 
p14r said:
Yup i did, so i shouldn't enter the negative sign?
No you shouldn't. Magnitudes are unsigned.
 
It worked, thank you so much!
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'

Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'

Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is（Figure 2）： F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Solving Astronaut Problem: Force & Acceleration
Replies
4
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top