Three parallel planes - calculating charge

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves three parallel planes with specified areas and distances, where the upper plane is charged and the other two are connected to a voltage source. Participants are tasked with calculating the charges on the middle and lower planes based on the given conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Gauss's law and the relationship between electric fields and charge. There are attempts to express the potential differences in terms of the charges on the planes. Questions arise about the interpretation of the problem statement and the assumptions regarding the connections to the voltage source.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations of the problem being explored. Some participants suggest different ways to analyze the charge distribution and potential differences, while others question the clarity of the problem's formulation. There is no explicit consensus, but several productive lines of reasoning have been proposed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the ambiguity in the problem statement regarding how the middle and lower planes are connected to the voltage source, which affects their approach to finding the solution.

Rugile
Messages
79
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


There are three parallel identical planes of area A = 200 cm^2, and the distance between the upper and the middle one as well as the distance between the middle and the lower one is d = 3cm. The upper plane was charged to q1 = 0.5 nC. The other two were connected to a V= 100V EMF source. Calculate the charges of the middle and lower planes.


Homework Equations


[itex]V = E * d[/itex]
[itex]E * A = q / \epsilon_0[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I firstly assumed that after being connected to the source, the potential of the middle plane is 0 V, and the potential of the lower plane - 100V. Then from Gaus's law, we find the electric field between the planes:
[itex]E_{12} * A = \frac{q_1 + q_2}{\epsilon_0}[/itex]
[itex]E_{23} * A = \frac{q_2 + q_3}{\epsilon_0}[/itex]
Where 1st, 2nd and 3rd planes are upper, middle and lower correspondingly.
Then
[itex]V_{12} = E_{12}*d = \frac{(q_1 + q_2)*d}{\epsilon_0 * A}[/itex]
[itex]V_{23} = 100 = E_{23}*d = \frac{(q_2 + q_3)*d}{\epsilon_0 * A}[/itex]
But here we have 3 unknowns and 2 equations... Are there any other ways to calculate [itex]V_{12}[/itex], for instance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would it help if you looked at the middle plane as if it were split into two parallel planes with a conductor in between ?
 
I'm sorry, but no, not really... I don't see what you are getting at :/

Though I just came up with an idea - please correct me if I'm wrong - but could you say that [itex]V_1 = \frac{kq_2}{d} + \frac{kq_3}{2d}[/itex] ? Saying that the potential of the first plate is created by the charges of 2nd and 3rd plates?
 
The idea of my proposal is that you consider the charge difference between the top two plates separately from the voltage difference between the bottom two. A nice Gauss volume passing between 2top and 2bottom would then help you along...

By the way, the formulation of the exercise leaves some possibilities for interpretation:
The other two were connected to a V= 100V EMF source
How were they connected?
 
Yes, I know the formulation is not completely clear, but there's no additional information... But I'm pretty sure we can assume that 2nd plate was connected to ground and 3rd one to 100V.

Hmm, I thought that's similar to what I did? :?
 
This would split up the charge on the middle plate: on 2top the mirror of the 0.5 nC and on 2bottom something to deal with the 100 V.

And I would ignore the influence of plate 1 on 3 and vice versa. With such vaguely described exercises maybe that is not directly evident.
 
What do you mean by 'mirror of the 0.5nC'? The potential by 1st plate?

So is this equation [itex]V_1 = \frac{kq_2}{d}[/itex] true then?
 
If a charge 0.5 nC is applied on the top plate, there will be a charge of -0.5 nC on the top side of the middle plate. The equation you now mention I haven't seen before. I did see a V12 that I did not believe. ANyway, they ask for charges, not voltages.

Due to the applied voltage between plate 2 and 3 there will be a charge buildup on the bottom of plate 2 and on the top of plate 3. Same ting: equal and opposite.

What I am trying to lure you into is to consider the top and the bottom of plate 2 separately but connected.
I don't think I've succeeded yet, right ?

Gotta go now for at least 5 hrs...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Forget top plate for a while.Treat the middle and bottom plates as a parallel plate capacitor .Can you find the capacitance of the capacitor .Using that and the voltage difference applied across the plates,find the charges on the plates .

Can you do that?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
BvU said:
Due to the applied voltage between plate 2 and 3 there will be a charge buildup on the bottom of plate 2 and on the top of plate 3. Same ting: equal and opposite.

What I am trying to lure you into is to consider the top and the bottom of plate 2 separately but connected.

Oh, so you mean, that the electrons of the top plate push the electrons of middle plate away? So then the total charge of middle plate is sum of middle top and middle bottom?

Tanya Sharma said:
Forget top plate for a while.Treat the middle and bottom plates as a parallel plate capacitor .Can you find the capacitance of the capacitor .Using that and the voltage difference applied across the plates,find the charges on the plates .

Can you do that?

You mean [itex]C = \frac{Q}{U} = \frac{\epsilon_0 A}{d}, Q = \frac{\epsilon_0 A U}{d}[/itex] ? Wow, could've checked capacitance formulas before! But why is the top plate given then? I mean, it should do some impact? Does it change the charge of the middle plate then?
 
  • #11
Rugile said:
You mean [itex]C = \frac{Q}{U} = \frac{\epsilon_0 A}{d}, Q = \frac{\epsilon_0 A U}{d}[/itex] ? Wow, could've checked capacitance formulas before! But why is the top plate given then? I mean, it should do some impact? Does it change the charge of the middle plate then?

Yes..that's right .The capacitor is formed between the bottom surface of the middle plate and top surface of the bottom plate .

The charge on the top plate will be entirely on the bottom surface .This charge will induce an equal and opposite charge on the top surface of the middle plate .

The middle plate will have unequal charge densities on its two surfaces .The net charge is the sum of the two.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #12
It's clear now! Thank you a lot, both for your help and patience :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
565