Thrust to weight ratio and lift

AI Thread Summary
A plane requires a thrust-to-weight ratio (TWR) of 1 to ascend vertically without losing speed, but can maintain level flight with a TWR of less than 1 due to the lift-to-drag ratio of its wings. In level flight, lift must equal weight, and engines provide the necessary power to generate lift, even with a TWR below 1. High-performance gliders demonstrate this with a lift-to-drag ratio of 60:1, allowing them to maintain altitude efficiently. The design of wings aims to minimize power needed for lift, balancing factors like cost and size. Ultimately, increasing mass flow by extending wing span reduces the power required for flight.
ayoyoayoyo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hello

a plane would need a thrust to weight ratio of 1 of fly straight up without losing speed
but how can a plane in level flight maintain its altitude with <1 TWR

since to maintain a level flight you need to have lift = weight
so your engine needs to supply enough power to generate enough lift, how can it do this with <1 TWR

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's because the lift to drag ratio of a wing is much less than 1. In the case of a high end glider, lift to drag ratio of the glider is 60:1. If glider and pilot weigh about 1500 lbs, then while in a steady decent with a forward speed of 60 mph the decent rate is 1 mph, which translates into the fact that it only takes 4 hp (the power from gravity on a 1500 lb object decending at 1 mph) to go forwards at 60 mph.

The idea of a wing is to minimize the amount of power it takes to generate lift force, with some compromises due to cost to build and size. The force is related to momentum change of the air, mass flow times velocity, while the power is related 1/2 mass flow times velocity2. By increasing the amount of mass flow (moving more air, usually with a longer wing span), the required power is reduced.
 
:) thanks for your answer
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top