Tide, Further 2 my post yesterday on tough integration

  • Thread starter Thread starter alonzo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the contaminant overflow from a holding tank into a lake. The user has successfully addressed the first two parts of a problem concerning contaminant concentration in a tank and the farmer's claim about compliance with regulations. For part three, the user seeks guidance on determining the volume of contaminant that overflows into the lake after four hours of inflow. The response outlines the necessary calculations, including the total inflow volume and the contaminant concentration from the river. This guidance aims to clarify the steps needed to find the overflow volume accurately.
alonzo
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Tide, Further 2 my post yesterday on tough integration...

Hey Tide! Thanks 4 answering my question, ur an absolute legend. I now know how 2 do parts one and 2 of the question. But I'm a bit stumped on part 3. I'm not sure wat 2 do when the contaminant is overflowing into the lake.


Just 2 refresh ur memory, here is the original question.
Thanks again!

A holding tank of 7000 litres is full of water which has been contaminated by a pollutant. The tank contains 0.01 percent contaminant by volume. Water with a contaminant concentration of 0.001 percent now flows from a river into the tank at a rate of 5 litres per minute. Since the tank is full, there is an overflow of water into a nearby lake.

1) What is the concentration of contaminant in the tank after 5 hours?

2) The farmer who owns the tank claims that the contents of the tank is under the legislated upper concentration limitation of 0.002 percent for the contaminant. If the inflow has been running for 4 hours, is the farmer's claim correct?

3) What is the volume of contaminant that has overflowed into the nearby lake after four hours?

:smile: :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To find the volume of the contaminant multiply the concentration in the tank by the effluent flow rate (I think I called it R_{out} in my posting) then integrate from t = 0 to the desired time.
 


Hey there! Glad to hear that my response was helpful. For part 3 of the question, you will need to calculate the total volume of water that has flowed into the tank from the river in 4 hours. Since the inflow rate is 5 litres per minute, in 4 hours, it would be 5x60x4 = 1200 litres. Then, you can use the concentration of the inflow (0.001 percent) to calculate the volume of contaminant that has entered the tank in 4 hours (0.001% of 1200 litres = 0.012 litres). Finally, you can subtract this volume from the total volume of water in the tank (7000 litres) to get the volume of water that has overflowed into the lake. Hope that helps! Let me know if you have any other questions. Good luck! :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
8K
Back
Top