I Time-dependent mass and the Lagrangian

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr rabbit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian Mass
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the formulation of the Lagrangian for a particle with time-dependent mass, expressed as L = 1/2 m(t) dot{r}^2 - U(r). It explores whether the kinetic energy needs to be rewritten when considering variable mass systems. The first method is deemed appropriate when mass changes do not create additional forces, such as in symmetrical mass ejection. However, it is noted that this approach is invalid for systems like rockets, where mass is expelled in a preferred direction, introducing significant forces. The second method is criticized for incorrectly applying the relationship between external force and momentum change in variable mass scenarios.
Mr rabbit
Messages
26
Reaction score
3
I was talking to a friend about Lagrangian mechanics and this question came out. Suppose a particle under a potential ##U(r)## and whose mass is ##m=m(t)##. So the question is: the Lagrangian of the particle can be expressed by

##L = \frac{1}{2} m(t) \dot{\vec{r}} ^2 -U(r)##

or I need to re-write the kinetic energy? Maybe this way

## \displaystyle T = \int \vec{F} \cdot d\vec{r} = \int \frac{d\vec{p}}{dt} \cdot \vec{v} \: dt = \int \vec{v} \cdot d\vec{p} = \int \vec{v} \cdot (\vec{v} \: dm + m \: d \vec{v}) = \int v^2 \: dm + \int m \: \vec{v} \cdot d \vec{v} ##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's as in your first equation. If ##r## is a single 1d coordinate, the equation of motion will be

##0 = \frac{\partial L}{\partial r} - \frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{r}}\right)##
## = -\frac{\partial U}{\partial r} - \frac{d}{dt}( m(t)\dot{r})##
## = -\frac{\partial U}{\partial r} - m(t)\ddot{r} - \dot{m}(t)\dot{r}##
 
  • Like
Likes Mr rabbit
Mr rabbit said:
I was talking to a friend about Lagrangian mechanics and this question came out. Suppose a particle under a potential ##U(r)## and whose mass is ##m=m(t)##. So the question is: the Lagrangian of the particle can be expressed by

##L = \frac{1}{2} m(t) \dot{\vec{r}} ^2 -U(r)##

or I need to re-write the kinetic energy? Maybe this way

## \displaystyle T = \int \vec{F} \cdot d\vec{r} = \int \frac{d\vec{p}}{dt} \cdot \vec{v} \: dt = \int \vec{v} \cdot d\vec{p} = \int \vec{v} \cdot (\vec{v} \: dm + m \: d \vec{v}) = \int v^2 \: dm + \int m \: \vec{v} \cdot d \vec{v} ##
The first method is appropriate when the process that changes the mass does not result in additional force on the remaining body. For example, when the body ejects mass in two opposite directions with the same rate. It is not valid for a rocket in flight, because mass is thrown away in a preferred direction and as a result, there is a strong force acting on the rocket. The second method is not a valid derivation, since for variable mass systems, external force does not in general equal d(mv)/dt.
 
  • Like
Likes Mr rabbit
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top