Time-dependent Schrodinger equation for many particles

AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
If you've got, say, three particles, then the time-dependent Schrodinger equation (in units where \hbar = 1) for the system reads

<br /> i \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} = -\sum_{i=1}^3 \frac{1}{2m_i} \Delta_i \psi + \sum_{i&lt;j} V(r_i - r_j)\psi,<br />

right? And of course \psi = \psi(r_1,r_2,r_3;t). But there isn't just ONE solution to this equation, right? There are MANY. And don't they correspond to, say, all particles being independent for large times, or one particle bound to another and the remaining one free, etc.? And I'm guessing this is at the heart of scattering theory - kind of examining the variety of long-time behaviors that can be exhibited in this case. Do I have this right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes that's right. The wave function as t\rightarrow \pm \infty and it's corresponding probabilities are what we can measure. Not only t, but also as r\rightarrow \infty which in a collider experiment is on the order of meters.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top