B Time Dilation: Away or Toward Observer?

Involute
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I thought the answer was no. I.e. the traveler's proper time always passes more slowly than a stationary observer's clock regardless of the traveler's direction with respect to the observer. I was watching Brian Greene's NOVA episode on time, however, and, at 23:15, he has a demonstration involving an alien 10 billion lightyears from Earth riding a bicycle away from, and then towards, us. When he's riding away, time slows down for him (with respect to us). When he's riding towards, it speeds up. This seems contradictory, but maybe I'm missing a detail, or misunderstood SR to begin with (or both). Thanks for any tips.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Involute said:
I thought the answer was no. I.e. the traveler's proper time always passes more slowly than a stationary observer's clock regardless of the traveler's direction with respect to the observer. I was watching Brian Greene's NOVA episode on time, however, and, at 23:15, he has a demonstration involving an alien 10 billion lightyears from Earth riding a bicycle away from, and then towards, us. When he's riding away, time slows down for him (with respect to us). When he's riding towards, it speeds up. This seems contradictory, but maybe I'm missing a detail, or misunderstood SR to begin with (or both). Thanks for any tips.
That all makes no sense. I notice the title of the video is:
The Fabric of the Cosmos: The Illusion of Time

I doubt you can learn any serious science from a video like that. It's not surprising you got some nonsense about an alien on a bicycle!
 
@Involute If A and B are moving relative to one another and watching each other’s clocks through telescopes... if they are moving towards one another they will both see the other’s clock running fast, and if they are moving away from one another they will both see the other’s clock running slow. This has nothing to do with relativity and time dilation; it’s just the Doppler effect, caused by the light travel time changing as the distance between them changes.

However, when they allow for the light travel time - that is, the light they see in their telescopes was emitted earlier and spent some time getting to them - and calculate the clock rates that would produce what they actually see then they both calculate that the other’s clock is running slower than their own. That is relativistic time dilation, and it is best understood as a manifestation of the relativity of simultaneity, not as “time slowing down”.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, Motore, hmmm27 and 1 other person
You are misinterpreting that part of the video. The difference between the two cases of the alien going away versus toward Earth is not about how fast the clock ticks. It is about how the clocks at different positions are synchronized to define simultaneous time ("now") in the reference frame of the alien as he goes away versus as he goes toward the earth.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top