B Time Dilation: Moving Rocket 0.5c vs Accelerating Rocket 0.5c

pavelbure9
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
A non-moving observer is looking at two different rockets in space. One rocket is moving at a steady velocity of 0.5c, and the other rocket is currently moving in 0.5c but has steadily accelerated from 0.3c and will continue accelerating until it gets to 0.7c.

Assuming that there is no gravity, currently (when both rockets are moving at a velocity of 0.5c), which rocket's time will the non-moving observer think is running slower?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does the time dilation formula include the acceleration anywhere?
 
Orodruin said:
Does the time dilation formula include the acceleration anywhere?
I was just wondering if I had to take General relativity into thought because there is an acceleration
 
No. Special relativity can handle acceleration just fine. And, as Orodruin implies, this question is straightforward.

Studying accelerating reference frames (not accelerating objects) was, I gather, one of the things that led Einstein to general relativity. Also, many special relativity courses avoid accelerating objects because you have to use fairly complicated calculus almost immediately. Taken together, this can lead to the impression that you can't do acceleration in special relativity. But that is wrong - as long as you're willing to do the maths, you can.
 
  • Like
Likes Fraser MacDonald
pavelbure9 said:
A non-moving observer is looking at two different rockets in space. One rocket is moving at a steady velocity of 0.5c, and the other rocket is currently moving in 0.5c but has steadily accelerated from 0.3c and will continue accelerating until it gets to 0.7c.

Assuming that there is no gravity, currently (when both rockets are moving at a velocity of 0.5c), which rocket's time will the non-moving observer think is running slower?

The transformation formulas for acceleration in special relativity are well known:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acceleration_(special_relativity)

From that, one obtains the formulas for proper acceleration (i.e. the acceleration that a comoving observer feels):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acceleration_(special_relativity)#Proper_acceleration

by which one finally obtains the formulas for constant proper acceleration, also known as hyperbolic motion, see
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/Rocket/rocket.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbolic_motion_(relativity)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acceleration_(special_relativity)#Curved_world_lines

Using those formulas, and plugging in some numbers, you should be able to compute the time of both rockets.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top