Time Dilation: Relativity's Surprising Effect

Holocene
Messages
237
Reaction score
0
Time dilation?

Relativity states that it's possible for a clock to run slower the closer it is to a gravitational field.

Basically, a clock at the top of a water tower will run faster than an identical clock at the base.

But aren't the clocks just simple instruments, that will run at the exact same speed regardless of their location?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Holocene said:
Relativity states that it's possible for a clock to run slower the closer it is to a gravitational field.

Basically, a clock at the top of a water tower will run faster than an identical clock at the base.

But aren't the clocks just simple instruments, that will run at the exact same speed regardless of their location?
Perhaps my web page on gravitational redshift can help since these are the same phenomena, See -
http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/gr/grav_red_shift.htm

Any questions, as I'm sure they will be, ask away. :smile:

Pete
 
Holocene said:
Relativity states that it's possible for a clock to run slower the closer it is to a gravitational field.

Basically, a clock at the top of a water tower will run faster than an identical clock at the base.

But aren't the clocks just simple instruments, that will run at the exact same speed regardless of their location?
Yes! A clock has no idea what altitude it is at and if you go look at the clock, you won't notice anything unusual about it's tick rate. Yet Relativity still is...
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top