Time Dilation: Slower vs. Faster at v=c?

Dabonez
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Apparently time flows slower in a system that's traveling at roughly the speed of light, but time dilation says that a time interval on Earth is longer than in the system traveling at v=c.Shouldn't that lead to the conclusion that time is flowing faster in a v=c system?

Excuse the lack of detailed description, as English is not my first language.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your English is excellent but it is still not at all clear what you are asking. "time flows slower in a system that's traveling at roughly the speed of light" is incorrect. Time flows slower that's traveling at roughly the speed of light relative to another system.

If we could observe what is happening in a system traveling at close to the speed of light (nothing would be happening in a system moving at the speed of light!) we would see things happening slower- its time would have slowed down. Conversely, we would be moving close to the speed of light as measured from the other system. They would observe time slowed down in our system.

I think your problem is with the phrase "time flow". If I observe something happening in another system taking twice as long, I observe time slowed down. The time interval for an action being twice as long does NOT mean that time is "flowing" faster.
 
This complements Halls post: Each moving observer sees the OTHER observer as in motion and hence the OTHER clock as slower; each perceives their OWN clock ticking normally. The point is that time is NOT absolute, motion is not absolute, length (space) is not absolute. All depend on the velocity (and maybe acceleration) of the observer.

Frames of reference are confusing and even Einstein spent considerable time studying them before launching into special relativity...they take effort,time and patience to understand...I'm still trying to!
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top