B Time Dilation: Traveling to a Distant Star in 4.5yr

versine
Messages
24
Reaction score
5
If there is a spaceship traveling at 0.999c, the time to reach a star 100 lyr away would be approx 100 yr (assuming no accel and decel). But on the spaceship, It would be 100 yr * sqrt(1-0.999^2) = 4.5yr.

Why do we take 100 yr as the time seen on Earth and not the time on the spaceship?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because presumably we are on Earth? Your question is not clear. The times are specific and different.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
Because most people's perspective is primarily rooted on Earth, so when we talk about distances, speeds, and time we usually only specifically state the reference frame when it is different from Earth's.
 
versine said:
If there is a spaceship traveling at 0.999c, the time to reach a star 100 lyr away would be approx 100 yr (assuming no accel and decel). But on the spaceship, It would be 100 yr * sqrt(1-0.999^2) = 4.5yr.

Why do we take 100 yr as the time seen on Earth and not the time on the spaceship?
Because the (length contracted) distance from Earth to the star in the frame of the spaceship is only
##100 lyr * \sqrt{1-0.999^2} = 4.5 lyr##.
 
versine said:
Why do we take 100 yr as the time seen on Earth and not the time on the spaceship?
Because that’s how much time a clock at rest on Earth (strictly speaking, at rest relative to the spaceship before it started on the journey) would count between the departure event and the arrival event.
There is a subtlety here: someone back on Earth doesn’t see the spaceship arrive at the destination at time 100; they see the arrival event happen after their clock has counted off 200 years (the light took 100 years to reach their eyes). Only after they subtract the light travel time from 200 do they conclude that the spaceship arrived at the same time that their clock had counted off 100 years.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, versine and hutchphd
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top