Time Dilation's Effect on Radioactive Decay

Sothh
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Does time dilation effect radioactive decay?

For example, if I speed a radioactive atom up to near light speeds, will its decay slow?

If so, could this be used to study atoms with a very short decay time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sothh said:
Does time dilation effect radioactive decay?
It affects all physical processes.

For example, if I speed a radioactive atom up to near light speeds, will its decay slow?
Sure.
 
Does temperature effect time dilation? Since a "hot" atom will be moving more then a "cold" atom, with the speed difference change the decay of the atom?
 
A classic example of the original question is cosmic-ray muons, which would be unlikely to reach the Earth's surface except for time dilation. An accelerator version: http://www.lightandmatter.com/html_books/genrel/ch02/ch02.html , Example 6: Large time dilation

Sothh said:
Does temperature effect time dilation? Since a "hot" atom will be moving more then a "cold" atom, with the speed difference change the decay of the atom?
Yes. The effect is extremely small at ordinary temperatures, but for example it's big enough to make the Mossbauer effect impossible to observe in gases:

http://www.lightandmatter.com/html_books/genrel/ch01/ch01.html#Section1.5 , 1.5.6 The Pound-Rebka experiment

-Ben
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks. That clears a lot up.

Everywhere else I have looked states that temperature does not effect radioactive decay.
 
Sothh said:
Thanks. That clears a lot up.

Everywhere else I have looked states that temperature does not effect radioactive decay.

The effect is extremely small, so that statement is an excellent approximation.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top