I Time, Entropy and Change: A Conjecture & Discussion

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dennis Plews
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjecture Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between time, change, and the second law of thermodynamics, with a focus on entropy as a driving force. Participants express concern over the lack of clear definitions for concepts like "essence" and "change," deeming the initial question philosophical rather than scientific. The second law of thermodynamics is acknowledged as an equation that describes measurable quantities, but its role as a "driver of change" is questioned. The complexity of physics is emphasized, suggesting that a formal background in the subject is necessary for deeper understanding. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of articulating scientific concepts without precise mathematical language.
Dennis Plews
Messages
37
Reaction score
4
The essence of time is change. A driver of change is the 2d Law of Thermodynamics. The expansion of the universe facilitates entropy. These relationships keep me wondering if they are a symmetry. Comments please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When phsicists talk about physics, they have given words to mathematical quantities. Ultimately, they are talking about measurable quantities that are well defined, and they are talking about equations. The 2nd law of thermodynamics is just an equation, and entropy is a well-defined physical quantity.

So, when you say that "The essence of time is change", we don't like it because you have not defined what essence or change are, in clear mathematical language. In other words, for us, it is philosophy at best, and nonsense at worst. It's the same when you say that the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics is a "driver of change". It doesn't mean anything. We also don't know what you're thinking of when you use words like "symmetry".

In short, no physicist can answer your question, since it is not a good question.

But it's okay. You seem to have a passion for physics. What science popularizers try to explain to the masses is indeed true, but it is hard to really grasp it without some formal background in mathematics and physics.

Physics is unfortunately hard, and even asking a question that is not nonsense is difficult, so don't panic. I encourage you to get some formal background in physics, or to keep reading and asking questions regarding what you have read, whichever suits you better.
 
  • Like
Likes Dennis Plews, Chestermiller and Drakkith
Not sure what you mean by "a symmetry", but yeah, expansion of the universe is increasing entropy.
 
  • Like
Likes Dennis Plews
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top