Time-evolution of a quantum system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the time evolution of an electron in a hydrogen atom under a magnetic field, with a focus on calculating the probabilities of finding the system in specific states at later times. The Hamiltonian is given as H = H0 - ωLz, and the time evolution operator U(t) is derived from the Hamiltonian. The user attempts to apply a matrix approach to find the probabilities but expresses confusion about the correctness of their method, particularly regarding the normalization of probabilities. They note that the probabilities calculated do not sum to one, raising doubts about their calculations. The conversation highlights the complexities of quantum mechanics and the challenges in accurately determining state probabilities over time.
Laby
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider an electron bound in a hydrogen atom under the influence of a homogenous
magnetic field B = zˆB  . Ignore the electron spin. The Hamiltonian of the system is H = H0 −ωLz ,where
H0 is the Hamiltonian of the hydrogen atom with the usual eigenstates nlm and eigenenergies (0) En
(we use the superscript (0) to denote the unperturbed hydrogen atom), and ω =|e |B/(2mec).

At t = 0 the system is in the state: |ψ(t=0)>=1/\sqrt{2}((|2,1,-1> -|2,1,1>)
For each of the following states
calculate the probability of finding the system at some later time t > 0 in that state:

1(t)>=1/\sqrt{2}(|2,1,-1&gt; - |2,1,1&gt;)<br /> <br /> |ψ<sub>2</sub>(t)&gt;=1/\sqrt{2}(|2,1,-1&amp;gt; + |2,1,1&amp;gt;)&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; |ψ&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;(t)&amp;gt;=1/\sqrt{2}(|2,1,0&amp;amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;Homework Equations&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; |ψ(t)&amp;amp;gt;=U(t)*|ψ(t=0)&amp;amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; U(t)=exp(-i*H*t/\hbar)&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;The Attempt at a Solution&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; So the time evolution of a system can be described by multiplying the wavefunction at t=0 by the function U(t) which in this case would be exp(-i*(E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(o)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;-|e |B/(2m&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;c)*t/\hbar). But then from there, I&amp;amp;#039;m a bit confused. Do I need to transform the equation into a matrix form and then take the square of the coefficients of the superimposed wavefunctions to get the probabilities? If that was the case, then I&amp;amp;#039;d be able to represent |ψ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(t)&amp;amp;gt;=1/\sqrt{2}[-1,0,1], |ψ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(t)&amp;amp;gt;=1/\sqrt{2}[1,0,1] and then |ψ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(t)&amp;amp;gt;=[0,1,0] right? &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Thanks for your help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, so I tried the matrix approach, but it doesn't seem quite right. Here is what I did:

With U(t)=exp(-i*(En(o)-|e |B/(2mec)*t/\hbar) I split that up into
U(t)=exp(-i*En(o)t/hbar)*exp(i*α*t/\hbar) where α=|e|B/(2mec)

from there I used the equation exp(iθ\widehat{n}\bullet\vec{σ})=Icos(θ)+i\widehat{n}\bullet\vec{σ}sin(θ)

where 'I' is the identity matrix

which gave me Icos(αt)+iBLzsin(αt) where I used the matrix representation of Lz

Now multiplying this new expression for U(t) gives me
|ψ(t)>=exp(i*En(o)*(cos(αt)|ψ1> -i*B*hbar*sin(αt)|ψ2>)

And we can take the square of the coefficients of the wavefunctions as their probabilities. So for example, the probability of |ψ3> would be 0, because it doesn't appear in the equation. Now, apart from appear really tenuous, the squares of the probabilities don't add up to 1, which makes me really doubt this is correct. Maybe I'd need to integrate from t=0 --> infinity, but that's a rather hard integral, and not likely either. Am I at least close?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top