B Time for which a vertical projectile stays motionless in midair

AI Thread Summary
When a projectile is thrown vertically, it momentarily stops at its highest point, but this stop occurs instantaneously, lasting zero seconds. The velocity at this peak is zero only at that exact moment, as it transitions from positive to negative velocity due to gravity. The acceleration is a constant negative value, leading to a linear decrease in velocity until it reaches the ground. Understanding this concept requires the application of Differential Calculus, which allows for the calculation of instantaneous values as intervals approach zero. Thus, while the projectile appears to stop, it does so without any measurable duration.
Curiosity_0
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
We know that if a projectile is thrown vertically, there will be a brief time when it momentarily stops. Can we calculate this brief moment?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That moment will be an instant, not a period of time.
 
Curiosity_0 said:
We know that if a projectile is thrown vertically, there will be a brief time when it momentarily stops. Can we calculate this brief moment?
It's zero seconds. It's the same for any other velocity on its trajectory.
 
Curiosity_0 said:
We know that if a projectile is thrown vertically, there will be a brief time when it momentarily stops. Can we calculate this brief moment?
As others have said, the velocity is zero only instantaneously. These plots of the vertical motion of a projectile should help. See how the acceleration due to gravity is a constant negative value (-g)?, and how the velocity decreases linearly from the initial ##v_0## down through zero to end up being ##-v_0## when the projectile impacts the ground?

1668529341533.png

https://cnx.org/resources/d7690f6d7871dafd158630fc8ea5b60846d9c9bf/PG12C1_007.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Spinnor, Tom.G, topsquark and 1 other person
Curiosity_0 said:
We know that if a projectile is thrown vertically, there will be a brief time when it momentarily stops. Can we calculate this brief moment?
It will stop at a particular clock-reading, but that clock-reading lasts for zero time.

As soon as the projectile reaches its highest point it starts to descend, it spends zero time at the highest point
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd, topsquark and Ibix
Curiosity_0 said:
We know that if a projectile is thrown vertically, there will be a brief time when it momentarily stops. Can we calculate this brief moment?
We 'think' we know that. Reasonable enough because things happen pretty slowly at the high point it would really boil down to how quickly and accurately we could actually measure that velocity. Zero velocity is actually no more special than +1m/s or -1.05m/s. This was a problem for the old Physicists until the concepts involved in Differential Calculus were introduced. The theory is that you consider a smaller and smaller interval between two (imagined) measurements the limit as the interval approaches zero is the 'true' value of the velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd and topsquark
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...

Similar threads

Back
Top