Time independent Klein–Gordon equation with boundary conditions.

Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,227
Reaction score
419
Say we consider the time independent Klein–Gordon equation, see:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klein–Gordon_equation

Lets impose the following boundary conditions, the function is zero at infinity and on some small ball of radius R centered on some origin the function is some complex number C. Assume we have a solution to the time independent Klein–Gordon equation such that psi(R) = C and psi(r=infinity) = 0.

Clearly a global phase change of psi(r) by exp[i*theta],

psi(r) --> psi(r)*exp[i*theta]

does not change the energy in the field psi(r) provided,

C --> C*exp[i*theta]

Is it easy to show that a local phase change which depends only on r,

psi(r) --> psi(r)*exp[i*theta(r)]

will increase the energy of the field? Assume,

C --> C*exp[i*theta(R)]


Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could one just argue that because psi(r) is a solution of the time independent Klein–Gordon equation psi(r) already minimizes energy and any change will only increase the energy?
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top