Time period of an oscillating body

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the time period of an oscillating body in a gravitational field, specifically when the body is situated in a parabolic shape. Participants explore the mathematical relationships involved, the necessary parameters, and the assumptions required to analyze the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks for the time period of a body under gravity, questioning whether the scenario is a gravity well.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need for a distance scale and clarifies the shape of the curve, suggesting it could be parabolic.
  • A later reply proposes that the shape can be taken as parabolic for simplification and states that the acceleration due to gravity can be considered constant.
  • There is a discussion on whether a shallow parabola has the same period as a deep one, indicating a need for a length scale.
  • Participants express a desire for a general understanding rather than a numerical value, seeking clarification on how to derive the formula for the period.
  • One participant derives the relationship for the period, stating it is proportional to the square root of the ratio of gravitational acceleration to a characteristic length scale.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on the definitions of variables used in the equations, particularly x and y in relation to the geometry of the problem.
  • There is confusion about the relationship between the weight component and the angles involved in the motion, with participants discussing the implications of the parabolic shape on these relationships.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the specifics of the problem, including the necessary parameters and the interpretation of the equations. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain regarding the definitions and relationships involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of defining a length scale and the shape of the curve, as well as the assumptions made about small-angle approximations in the analysis. There are unresolved questions about the geometry and the implications of the derived equations.

s0ft
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
2usu4uq.png

In the above figure, what would be the time period of the body(in red) under gravity, neglecting any non-conservative forces?
And what do call this type of situation? A gravity well or sth?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question cannot be answered unless you provide a distance scale. Also, what is that shape supposed to be? Is it parabolic, or something else?

p.s welcome to Physics Forums.
 
The shape can be taken to be parabolic, if it simplifies things. And if this is what you wanted me to clarify, the value of acceleration due to gravity can be taken to be a constant.
And I'm most thankful for the welcome.
 
You still need a length scale. Does a shallow parabola have the same period as a deep one?
 
You may take any case as long as it doesn't look a wholly different problem. And you're most welcome to give any well put example for the problem of this sort, if it is possible. I just want to get a general idea about this.
 
This is "how long is a piece of string". The period will be proportional to sqrt(g/L), where L is some characteristic length scale in the problem. If you don't give us L, we can't give you t.
 
I don't mean to get a numerical value. Just take some variables and show me the way it's done. That's all. Or is there something else to it that I don't understand?
I just want to know how you get to the sqrt(g/L) part.
 
Just take some variables and show me the way it's done.
Okay, I think we can work something out here. Hope you're familiar with calculus :smile:

Let L be the length defined by
Height above valley bottom = Horizontal distance from valley bottom​
I.e., to find L, draw a 45 degree line from the red dot. The line will intersect the curve at the height L.

The level or height of the ground, above the valley bottom, is then given by
[tex]\begin{align}<br /> & y/L = (x/L)^2 \\<br /> \text{or} &\\<br /> & y = x^2 / L<br /> \end{align}[/tex]
(Check for yourself that this equation has the two desired properties: (1) it is a parabola, and (2) y=L when x=L)

Now apply Newton's 2nd Law for the horizontal (x-direction) motion:

[Edit: added cosθ term below]
[tex]\begin{align}<br /> ma & =F \\<br /> \\<br /> m \frac{d^2x}{dt^2} &= -mg \sin \theta \cos \theta, \\<br /> \end{align}[/tex]
where θ is the angle of the slope.

If we restrict the motion to small-amplitude oscillations (i.e. x is much smaller than L), then we can make the approximation
[tex] \sin \theta \cos \theta \approx \theta \approx \tan \theta = \frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{2x}{L}[/tex][Edit: added cosθ term above]

Substituting this for sinθ in the earlier equation, we get

[tex]\begin{align}<br /> m \frac{d^2x}{dt^2} &= -mg \frac{2x}{L} \\<br /> \\<br /> \frac{d^2x}{dt^2} & = -\frac{2g}{L}x \\<br /> \end{align}[/tex]

This is a well-known differential equation, with the particle oscillating sinusoidally at angular frequency
[tex]\omega = \sqrt{\frac{2g}{L}} \text{ in radians/second}[/tex]
So the period of oscillation would be
[tex]T = \frac{2 \pi}{\omega}<br /> = 2 \pi \sqrt{\frac{L}{2g}} [/tex]
Using g≈10 m/s2, you can calculate the period for, say L=0.3 meter -- or about 1 foot, the size of a hole you might dig in the ground with a shovel.
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much!
But I didn't quite get the y and x, what are they defined to be?
I mean how do they go into the geometry?
And I don't understand what
L = Height above valley bottom = Horizontal distance from valley bottom
means. Do you mean something like this:
16ifc7r.png

?
 
  • #10
X and y would be your normal Cartesian coordinates which are not in your picture, but need to be.

Your description of L is correct.
 
  • #11
Sdtootle said:
X and y would be your normal Cartesian coordinates which are not in your picture, but need to be.
I'll just add that the origin is located at the red dot at the bottom of the valley, and x & y refer to points along the white curve.
Your description of L is correct.
Yes.
 
  • #12
Thanks but I don't understand. If you could present your idea in a picture similar to mine, it could help a lot. I don't get how y/L=(x/L)^2
 
  • #13
That's a technique used to figure out the constant terms in an equation, when we already know the equation's general form. It's mostly a matter of manipulating the algebra.

We know that we are trying to express a parabola, with it's minimum point -- the red dot in your figure, or the bottom green dot in the figure below -- located at the origin (x=y=0). This is really the picture you drew already, but here is an example including x and y coordinates:

pa2e.gif

In general, every parabola like this can be expressed mathematically in the following form:
[tex] \frac{y}{\text{something}} = \left( \frac{x}{\text{something}} \right) ^2[/tex]
... and then we have to figure out what the two "somethings" are to get a final expression.

We have to know the value of some point on the parabola in order to plug numbers into the "somethings" above. The green dot at the upper right of the figure tells us that the point (x=8,y=16) is on the parabola, so we can use the 8 and 16 in the equation:

[tex] \frac{y}{16} = \left( \frac{x}{8} \right) ^2[/tex]
It's important to realize two things about the above equation:
1. It describes a parabola (due to the x2 )
2. It is a correct equation for (x=8, y=16)

And doing some algebra, we get
[tex]\begin{align}<br /> y &= 16\left( \frac{x}{8} \right) ^2 \\<br /> \\<br /> y &= \frac{16}{8^2}x^2 =\frac{16}{64} x^2\\<br /> \\<br /> y &= \frac{1}{4} x^2 \ \ \text{ or, equivalently, } \ \ y = 0.25 \ x^2<br /> \end{align}[/tex]

So that is the equation of the parabola. By the way, you may notice that the point (4,4) is located on the parabola as well. So we could have used 4 for each "something", and we would have ended up with the same result. (In this example, the value of L would be 4.)
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Does the weight resolve into mgsinθcosθ in this way?
28h21j8.png

And you said tanθ=dy/dx but wasn't y the vertical length scale and x the horizontal according to the parabolic equation you explained? Still confused.
Thank you for the effort you're putting!
 
  • #15
x and y can refer to any point on the parabola, not just the point used to figure out the length scale.

See the attached figure, showing a parabola with length scale of 4. At the point (x,y), the parabola has some slope, as indicated by the black diagonal line.

attachment.php?attachmentid=54246&d=1356445822.gif

θ is the angle of the sloping line from the horizontal. And tanθ gives the value of the slope, i.e. [itex]\frac{\Delta y}{\Delta x}[/itex] or "rise over run".
 

Attachments

  • Parabola01.gif
    Parabola01.gif
    8.1 KB · Views: 1,229

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
18K