Time & Speed of Light: Not a Universal Constant

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of time as a non-universal constant, emphasizing that it is influenced by the relative speeds of bodies and their distances. The postulates of relativity prohibit traveling at the speed of light, and observers will perceive time differently based on their relative motion. Specifically, while one observer may perceive another's clock ticking slower, the rate of ticking is constant when measured against a common reference. The conversation clarifies misconceptions about the relativistic Doppler effect and the invariance of clock rates regardless of distance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's Theory of Relativity
  • Familiarity with relativistic Doppler effect
  • Knowledge of time dilation concepts
  • Basic grasp of reference frames in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity in detail
  • Learn about the relativistic Doppler effect and its mathematical formulations
  • Explore time dilation and its implications in high-speed travel
  • Investigate reference frames and their significance in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of relativity, and anyone interested in the fundamental nature of time and motion in the context of modern physics.

Shubh Goel
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Assumption travelling at speed of light is possible.
1. We are in empty space. I am travelling backwards(I am facing the direction opposite to my direction of motion) at half the speed of light. My other friend is travelling in opposite direction with the same speed being backward. If i look in the direction of my friend, i will see him getting slower and slower as we move apart even though relative velocity between us is still the same.
Time as we perceive is not a universal constant. It depends on the speed of the bodies and the distance between them.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shubh Goel said:
Assumption traveling at speed of light is possible.
It isn't - it's prohibited by the postulates of relativity.
Shubh Goel said:
I am traveling backwards(I am facing the direction opposite to my direction of motion) at half the speed of light. My other friend is traveling in opposite direction with the same speed being backward.
Travelling at those speeds with respect to what? In what follows I'm assuming that you are specifying both speeds with respect to some common reference.
Shubh Goel said:
If i look in the direction of my friend, i will see him getting slower and slower as we move apart even though relative velocity between us is still the same.
No - you will always see him moving at constant velocity, 80% of the speed of light (in relativity velocities do not add the same way as they do in Newtonian physics). You will see his clocks ticking at a constant rate, albeit slower than your own.
Shubh Goel said:
Time as we perceive is not a universal constant. It depends on the speed of the bodies and the distance between them.
This depends a lot on what you mean by "time as we perceive it". Your own wristwatch, for example, will always tick at the same rate whatever your state of motion. Other people's watches may well tick at different rates as measured by you, but they would have the opposite opinion about whose watch is ticking normally and whose is ticking slowly.

Clock rates do not depend on distance, though. I suspect you have misunderstood something around the relativistic Doppler effect. It's fairly easy to show that you will see your friend's watch ticking at a constant rate of once every three seconds. The general formula for someone receding from you at speed ##v## is that their clock ticks once every $$\sqrt{\frac{c+v}{c-v}}$$seconds. If you correct for the increasing light travel time, you will calculate a tick rate of once every ##(1-v^2/c^2)^{-1/2}## seconds, which turns out to be once for every 1.67 ticks of your watch in your scenario. Neither of these formulae depend on the distance between you.
 
Last edited:
The OP is based on a misunderstanding of relativity, which has been explained. Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
6K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K