John Fennie
- 24
- 2
Is going back in time fundamentally ruled out by Lorentz invariance? Or not? Or is it something else?
Either as a physical transportation, or literally turning back time.Nugatory said:What exactly do you mean by "going back in time"?
John Fennie said:Either as a physical transportation, or literally turning back time.
Take t to be positive, the metric will then have all positive (or all negative) components, hence no time component.ZapperZ said:Try it. Substitute t → -t in any of the Lorentz transformation. Has anything changed?
Zz.
The t term in the metric is squared. Negating its sign has what effect?John Fennie said:But I am not sure what you are trying to have me see.
It does not have any effect on the spacetime interval, which means that having negative t is allowed.jbriggs444 said:The t term in the metric is squared. Negating its sign has what effect?
Do you believe that all possible mathematical solutions apply to the real Universe?John Fennie said:which means that having negative t is allowed.
I understand. How do you guys interpret time physically? Because even time reversal is allowed, how can one physically have say, a particle, go back in time? Is there any sort of theory on the physical applications for going backward? (Just like traveling in a spaceship is a physical application for going forward.)sophiecentaur said:Do you believe that all possible mathematical solutions apply to the real Universe?
You should, perhaps replace "means" with "could imply".
John Fennie said:How do you guys interpret time physically?
John Fennie said:Because even time reversal is allowed, how can one physically have say, a particle, go back in time? Is there any sort of theory on the physical applications for going backward? (Just like traveling in a spaceship is a physical application for going forward.)