Time & Universe: Relative Meaning & Age

  • Thread starter Thread starter ubcstudent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of relativity in understanding the age of the universe, which is commonly stated as 13.75 billion years. It explores how time measurements can vary based on the observer's frame of reference, particularly in relation to the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). One participant estimates that a clock at rest with respect to the CMB would measure time slightly faster, suggesting a difference of about 10 years. The conversation also questions whether there is an "absolute" frame of reference in the universe, concluding that while there is no absolute space-time, there exists a specific frame related to the CMB. The complexities of measuring time and age in a relativistic context are highlighted throughout the discussion.
ubcstudent
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
If time is relative then what does it mean when they say the universe is 13.75 billion year old?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe the universe is 13.7 billion years old as per a clock on Earth. A clock at rest with respect to the CMB and away from any major gravitational sources would be SLIGHTLY faster. About 10 years faster by my estimate.
 
ubcstudent said:
If time is relative then what does it mean when they say the universe is 13.75 billion year old?

Same as when we say "my car is 10 years old".
 
Drakkith, are you suggesting, that there is absolute space-time FOR? More or less equal to CMB?
(1 - sqrt(1 - (370/300000)^2)))*13.7*10^9
10419 years according to me.
 
Last edited:
An absolute frame? No. But there is a frame that is at rest with respect to the CMB.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top