Time-varying expectation values

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi all.

I have a question which arose from the answer of a homework problem. A particle is in the state given by

<br /> \left| \psi \right\rangle = \frac{1}{{\sqrt 3 }}\left[ {\left| \psi \right\rangle _1 + \left| \psi \right\rangle _2 + \left| \psi \right\rangle _3 } \right],<br />

where {\left| \psi \right\rangle }_i is a stationary state of the Hamiltonian. Finding the expectation value of an operator Q in this state, it turns out that <Q> is time-dependent (in fact it oscillates). I was wondering how it is possible to have a time-dependent expectation value? If there was a time-dependent perturbation, then I would be convinced, since the state {\left| \psi \right\rangle } would change over time, but in this case {\left| \psi \right\rangle } doesn't change.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the three states has different energies (eigenvalue of the hamiltonian) and thus they evolve in a different way.
 
When you have just a single state, calculating the expectation value of any operator requires you to multiply the wavefunction by it's complex conjugate. For that reason, the time dependency (the complex exponent) cancels out.
e^{ix} (e^{ix})^* = e^{ix}e^{-ix} = 1

If however you have multiple states like now, the complex exponents do not cancel out. Actually, a few terms cancel out like usual, but you are left with cross terms that do not, since the states have different energies.
e^{ix_1} (e^{ix_2})^* = e^{ix_1}e^{-ix_2} \neq 1 (in general)
 
But what does this mean physically? I'm having a hard time interpreting how this can physically be possible without any external (time-varying) perturbation.
 
think of every eigenstate as a wave with different frequency, in this way the modulo has different value at different times.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top