Titration of Nitrous Acid with Sodium Hydroxide

AI Thread Summary
In the titration of 25.0 ml of 0.150 M nitrous acid (HNO2) with 0.150 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH), the pH at the equivalence point is calculated to be 8.11. At the equivalence point, the volumes of both solutions are equal, resulting in a total volume of 50.0 ml. To determine the new concentration, one must understand that both acid and base are present in equal proportions, leading to a neutralization reaction. The discussion emphasizes the importance of recognizing the definition of the equivalence point and calculating the new molarity of the resulting solution. This foundational understanding is crucial for accurately determining the pH after the titration.
rcrx
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
A 25.0 ml sample of 0.150 M HNO2 is titrated with a 0.150 M NaOH solution. What is the pH at the equivalence point? The Ka of HNO2 is 4.50x10-4


What I can't get is the fact I don't know how much has already been titrated at the equivalence point. So it's difficult to know the total volume to find the new concentration.

The answer is supposed to be pH = 8.11, and I could guess that with the titration of a weak acid with a strong base that the pH will rise a bit. But I can't presume how to do this mathematically.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rcrx said:
What I can't get is the fact I don't know how much has already been titrated at the equivalence point. So it's difficult to know the total volume to find the new concentration.
If you are having trouble with this, you should take a step back ... and start at the definition of the equivalence point. What is the definition?
 
Both concentrations are in equal proportion and neither consumes the other. So that means there is 25.0 + 25.0 for a combined total of 50ml?
 
Correct. Now, what's the next step?
 
Find the new Molarity of either substance?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top