Titration of Weak Acid HCN: Calculating pH on Zumdahl's Chemistry (9th edition)

AI Thread Summary
In the titration of 50 mL of 0.100 M HCN with 0.100 M NaOH, after adding 8.00 mL of NaOH, the calculated pH is 8.49, which raises concerns due to the low concentration of H+ ions at 3.3x10^-9 M. The confusion stems from the assumption that H+ concentration is negligible, despite it being lower than the typical concentration in pure water. The formation of CN- during titration acts as a strong base, which consumes H+ ions from water's autodissociation, affecting the overall pH. This interaction complicates the calculations, leading to a basic pH even with a small amount of added base. Understanding the role of CN- is crucial for accurately interpreting the pH results in weak acid titrations.
alingy1
Messages
325
Reaction score
0
Hello, on Zumdahl's Chemistry (9th edition), p.736:
HCN, weak acid (Ka=6.2x10^-10), is dissolved in water. 50ml sample of 0.100M HCN is titrated with 0.100M NaOH. Calculate pH after 8.00 mL of 0.100M NaOH has been added.

The steps are given. Then final answer is 8.49. That makes no sense to me! You added so little base to get a basic pH!
The concentration of H+ is 3.3x10^-9 M. However, this value is really low. When you do the calculations, you assume that H+ concentration is 0 in this problem. But, that doesn't make any sense since the concentration you get is lower than the normal concentration of H+ in water (10^-7M). WHAT IS GOING ON?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
While titrating you produce CN-. CN- is a quite strong base consuming H+ from the water autodissociation.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top