To go or not go to College that is the question?

[jedishrfu]

A cost benefit analysis of a college degree:

http://venturebeat.com/2014/09/06/this-is-how-you-visualize-the-value-of-a-college-science-degree/

 

[ModusPwnd]

I sure with the college option worked out like that for me! It took me years just to get an entry level job after graduating. My debt grows every year because I cannot pay more than my interest. Ill never own a house and never build equity. I had to postpone starting a family until I was over 30. While in school I was working and studying 60+ hours a week. Now that I have a career I work 50+ hours a week. That time lost is precious and priceless. It wasn't worth it for me. But then, I probably have a different set of values than others. My career is not my number one priority.

 

[StatGuy2000]

I sure with the college option worked out like that for me! It took me years just to get an entry level job after graduating. My debt grows every year because I cannot pay more than my interest. Ill never own a house and never build equity. I had to postpone starting a family until I was over 30. While in school I was working and studying 60+ hours a week. Now that I have a career I work 50+ hours a week. That time lost is precious and priceless. It wasn't worth it for me. But then, I probably have a different set of values than others. My career is not my number one priority.

You claim that going to college/university wasn't worth it for you, but couldn't you argue that in your case that's because you have chosen the wrong major (i.e. physics)? If you had to go back and do it all over again, would you have simply decided not to go to college/university at all, or simply chosen a different major (e.g. engineering, law, medicine, computer science, etc.)?

Because that first article doesn't take into account that not all college degrees, including STEM degrees, are alike in terms of opportunities or marketability.

 

[SteamKing]

There are good jobs out there for those who are not academically inclined and who want to start work right out of HS. The world always needs plumbers, electricians, welders, mechanics, etc. to take care of the machinery which makes civilization possible.

Some of these trades are in such short supply that apprentice programs have been set up in partnership with industries looking for workers with these skills and governments trying to attract industry. By enrolling in these programs, the apprentice could get his training largely paid for by his future employer, and there will be a full-time job waiting for him at the completion of the program.

The apprentice will have learned a valuable trade without taking on a heavy financial burden that paying for college would entail.

 

[StatGuy2000]

There are good jobs out there for those who are not academically inclined and who want to start work right out of HS. The world always needs plumbers, electricians, welders, mechanics, etc. to take care of the machinery which makes civilization possible.

Some of these trades are in such short supply that apprentice programs have been set up in partnership with industries looking for workers with these skills and governments trying to attract industry. By enrolling in these programs, the apprentice could get his training largely paid for by his future employer, and there will be a full-time job waiting for him at the completion of the program.

The apprentice will have learned a valuable trade without taking on a heavy financial burden that paying for college would entail.

That's all well and good, but it may be the case that these apprenticeship programs may not be generally available across the country. I know that in Canada, these programs are capable of only accepting a limited # of applicants, due in large part due to a shortage of experienced journeypersons (i.e. people who supervise you during the apprenticeship), which in turn is caused by the sheer # of hours each journeyperson needs to devote to train each apprentice. See this article below.

http://higheredstrategy.com/apprenticeships-so-long-so-little-technical-training/

I suspect that the situation may not be all that different in the US (although others can speak to this).

 

[462chevelle]

There are good jobs out there for those who are not academically inclined and who want to start work right out of HS. The world always needs plumbers, electricians, welders, mechanics, etc. to take care of the machinery which makes civilization possible.

Some of these trades are in such short supply that apprentice programs have been set up in partnership with industries looking for workers with these skills and governments trying to attract industry. By enrolling in these programs, the apprentice could get his training largely paid for by his future employer, and there will be a full-time job waiting for him at the completion of the program.

The apprentice will have learned a valuable trade without taking on a heavy financial burden that paying for college would entail.

The thing about these kind of jobs, is that you rely on your body 100%.
All the older people i know in skilled trade jobs are wore out by the time theyre 40-45.
Not to mention the 50-100k dollar tool expense. While they tell you that you can make 20 dollars an hour doing it, in reality is more like 10 dollars an hour after expenses. Then people will never leave you alone, always wanting you to work on something.

 

[jedishrfu]

The thing about these kind of jobs, is that you rely on your body 100%.
All the older people i know in skilled trade jobs are wore out by the time theyre 40-45.
Not to mention the 50-100k dollar tool expense. While they tell you that you can make 20 dollars an hour doing it, in reality is more like 10 dollars an hour after expenses. Then people will never leave you alone, always wanting you to work on something.

Unless of course they become foremen or managers...

 

[Choppy]

I would not consider someone listing "high school graduate" as their top education as equivalent to a skilled trade worker. For most skilled trades you require about a year or more of post-secondary education and then you get into an apprenticeship. Since most apprentices are paid, it's obviously not the cost same as a four-year university education, but there is still an up front cost.

I can undestand why some people don't want to go into the trades. My parents and grandparents for example have had a lot of doors slammed in their faces because they didn't have a university education, or been in positions where they had to take orders from someone who had that education, but wasn't necessarily any smarter. And so of course it's easy to understand why that generation would push it's children to aspire to better conditions.

But the times have also changed. Skilled trades can make a lot more money now than they did a generation ago. And now a univeristy education is much more common. It looks like the percentage of people with a university degree has roughly doubled since the 1960s and now about a quarter of the population has a university degree. On top of that, access to information is far less restricted these days.

And there's something else with respect to the trades. I suspect, although I have no evidence, that the average person's skills are waning. How often do people change their own oil anymore? One can easily look up how to do something on youtube, but that only gives one knowledge - not skill. Skill comes with doing. Hence, even though this generation can probably do a lot more, its easier to let a skilled person do the work. And therein, demand rises.

 

[ModusPwnd]

You claim that going to college/university wasn't worth it for you, but couldn't you argue that in your case that's because you have chosen the wrong major (i.e. physics)? If you had to go back and do it all over again, would you have simply decided not to go to college/university at all, or simply chosen a different major (e.g. engineering, law, medicine, computer science, etc.)?

No, I don't think I would go at all. Its easy to live off of what americans consider low pay and the extra money isn't worth the time and costs. I would have devoted more time to family, friends, hobbies, owning a home and enjoying my youth. I can still do some of that now of course, and I do. I like my job and the pay is above average and I have health care for the first time ever. So its not all bad, but its a consolation prize and wasn't worth playing the game.

I really hate moving and being a perpetual renter from student loans sucks. Especially because I love my dogs and need a place that will take them with a little yard.

 

[homeomorphic]

Undergraduate degrees aren't so bad, if you have a major that will help you get a job and/or get some good internships (if you are a job-search-wiz, go ahead and major in physics or math or English or whatever, but if you're not, pick something marketable to avoid a major headache when you graduate). 22 is still young.

Grad school, on the other hand, can be a mistake of epic proportions. I am now behind where I should have been at age 22 in a lot of ways. I'd probably have figured out dating and be married with kids by now, for one thing. I have a vision to salvage what I can from my math education and turn into something much better than conventional academic success as a professor, but it has put me so far behind, I think it's going to be an uphill battle to find the spare time and energy I need to pull it off.

I go back and forth about whether I regret it. For one thing, I don't like to rewrite history, and imagine alternative lives that I could have lived, which may or may not have happened. Regret isn't that useful. I just have to move on at some point. It's taking a while, though. It's not fun to put so much into something, only to realize that it wasn't even what I wanted to do at all. It's a big loss. It takes time to heal those wounds. Another thing is, I am glad to have discovered that today's academic math was a wolf in sheep's clothing, as far as I'm concerned, a realization that I may not have come to, without my painful experience in grad school. I think time will tell better if it was really worth it, but I know that I paid a very heavy price.

 

[StatGuy2000]

No, I don't think I would go at all. Its easy to live off of what americans consider low pay and the extra money isn't worth the time and costs. I would have devoted more time to family, friends, hobbies, owning a home and enjoying my youth. I can still do some of that now of course, and I do. I like my job and the pay is above average and I have health care for the first time ever. So its not all bad, but its a consolation prize and wasn't worth playing the game.

I really hate moving and being a perpetual renter from student loans sucks. Especially because I love my dogs and need a place that will take them with a little yard.

I suppose that would depend on where you live -- I don't think I would be able to afford to live where I do if I didn't graduate from university and enter in the field I'm currently working in (and yes, I did take out student loans which I have completely paid off 3 years upon graduation).

 

[StatGuy2000]

Undergraduate degrees aren't so bad, if you have a major that will help you get a job and/or get some good internships (if you are a job-search-wiz, go ahead and major in physics or math or English or whatever, but if you're not, pick something marketable to avoid a major headache when you graduate). 22 is still young.

Grad school, on the other hand, can be a mistake of epic proportions. I am now behind where I should have been at age 22 in a lot of ways. I'd probably have figured out dating and be married with kids by now, for one thing. I have a vision to salvage what I can from my math education and turn into something much better than conventional academic success as a professor, but it has put me so far behind, I think it's going to be an uphill battle to find the spare time and energy I need to pull it off.

I go back and forth about whether I regret it. For one thing, I don't like to rewrite history, and imagine alternative lives that I could have lived, which may or may not have happened. Regret isn't that useful. I just have to move on at some point. It's taking a while, though. It's not fun to put so much into something, only to realize that it wasn't even what I wanted to do at all. It's a big loss. It takes time to heal those wounds. Another thing is, I am glad to have discovered that today's academic math was a wolf in sheep's clothing, as far as I'm concerned, a realization that I may not have come to, without my painful experience in grad school. I think time will tell better if it was really worth it, but I know that I paid a very heavy price.

Whether or not grad school is a mistake really depends on many factors from individual interest in the research to the choice of what your research field is. For example, in my field (statistics) many positions often require a MS or PhD, so pursuing a grad degree could be a wise choice, and I have no regrets whatsoever in completing a MS. I would note that I did contemplate pursuing a PhD at one point but ultimately decided not to, and I'm not sure whether that was the right decision for me or not. But then again, I make a great living doing what I do, so I really have no reason to complain.

 

[homeomorphic]

Whether or not grad school is a mistake really depends on many factors from individual interest in the research to the choice of what your research field is. For example, in my field (statistics) many positions often require a MS or PhD, so pursuing a grad degree could be a wise choice, and I have no regrets whatsoever in completing a MS. I would note that I did contemplate pursuing a PhD at one point but ultimately decided not to, and I'm not sure whether that was the right decision for me or not. But then again, I make a great living doing what I do, so I really have no reason to complain.

My comments on choice of major also apply to grad school. If my PhD was in electrical engineering or computer science, I probably would have no regrets, although I would still be further behind in life than if I had just gotten a job. Also, a PhD is much more difficult, risky, and costly in terms of time and effort than a masters, so it's on a very different level.

 

[KL7AJ]

This is such a loaded question. In my case, by the time I got out of high school, I had numerous marketable skills. Obviously, this isn't the case in America any more.

Going to college to "find out what you want to do" is a very expensive proposition these days. Unless you know ahead of time what you want to specialize in, and really focus your college education, you might be better off starting a startup. This is a scary proposition for lots of folks, but youth is always on your side. You can fail several times and recover nicely...a bit harder in mid-life...though I've done it myself.

Whatever you do, don't choose a career just because everyone says it's "hot." That can change overnight. Choose something you NEED to do, and that will carry you through all the "non-hot" times. Absolute job security results when you do something nobody else is doing.

My 2 cents' worth.

Eric

 

[jedishrfu]

This is such a loaded question. In my case, by the time I got out of high school, I had numerous marketable skills. Obviously, this isn't the case in America any more.

Going to college to "find out what you want to do" is a very expensive proposition these days. Unless you know ahead of time what you want to specialize in, and really focus your college education, you might be better off starting a startup. This is a scary proposition for lots of folks, but youth is always on your side. You can fail several times and recover nicely...a bit harder in mid-life...though I've done it myself.

Whatever you do, don't choose a career just because everyone says it's "hot." That can change overnight. Choose something you NEED to do, and that will carry you through all the "non-hot" times. Absolute job security results when you do something nobody else is doing.

My 2 cents' worth.

Eric

Actually going to college has always been an expensive proposition. We often compare the cost of going when we did to what we make now and that's not a fair comparison.

For me college felt expensive, but I had help in the way of a small partial scholarship and working part-time. In the end, I had to pay back 8 grand which I felt was a lot of money with minimal wage at less than $2 an hour, but with a new job, living at home with no family and biking to work I saved enough to pay it off within a year. Nowadays that's a trivial amount to pay back.

 

[StatGuy2000]

This is such a loaded question. In my case, by the time I got out of high school, I had numerous marketable skills. Obviously, this isn't the case in America any more.

Going to college to "find out what you want to do" is a very expensive proposition these days. Unless you know ahead of time what you want to specialize in, and really focus your college education, you might be better off starting a startup. This is a scary proposition for lots of folks, but youth is always on your side. You can fail several times and recover nicely...a bit harder in mid-life...though I've done it myself.

Whatever you do, don't choose a career just because everyone says it's "hot." That can change overnight. Choose something you NEED to do, and that will carry you through all the "non-hot" times. Absolute job security results when you do something nobody else is doing.

My 2 cents' worth.

Eric

The thing about a startup is that you really need to know what type of business you want to "start up" in, and you either need to have technical know-how in that business or partner with someone who does. More often than not, that knowledge tends to be acquired while at college/university, whether they complete the education or not. Think of the examples of Google, Facebook, Microsoft, etc. The founders of all of these had their start while attending college/university (sure, Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates didn't finish their degrees, but it was their university contacts and courses that introduced them to the ideas from which their business began).

 

[homeomorphic]

Personally, I was a professor's son (free tuition + scholarship+some college savings), so the only financial cost was opportunity cost (pretty huge for grad school, even though I got paid there). So, the full financial cost is not an issue for everyone, but student debt is a huge deal. I really hate the idea of debt, so I probably wouldn't have gone to college, if it wasn't already taken care of by my parents.

Whatever you do, don't choose a career just because everyone says it's "hot." That can change overnight. Choose something you NEED to do, and that will carry you through all the "non-hot" times. Absolute job security results when you do something nobody else is doing.

Well, we all know math and physics are not going to be hot anytime in the near future. So, I think you can very well rule out careers that are definitely not going to be "hot" when you graduate. In my case I love computers. Choosing math rather computer science or sticking it out with my EE major was mostly just ignorance on my part. It's fine to choose the "hotter" of two things that you like. I think a lot of people do what I did and just kind of go with whatever seems the coolest to you at the time. But what YOU think is cool can change, just as easily as what's hot, and there's no point in choosing something that's 5% cooler to you at the time when it's less marketable.

The best way for me to get a mathematically satisfying job was probably to do engineering. Math just prepares you to be a professor, unless you study something more towards the engineering side of math or mathematical modeling/computation. So, the most interesting academic path might be very different from what will land you the most interesting job.

 

[ModusPwnd]

I don't think I would be able to afford to live where I do if I didn't graduate from university and enter in the field I'm currently working in.

So you are the poorest person in your city? All those with less than a university degree have moved away (or died off)? Or do you just exclude yourself to the rich neighborhood? I'm suspicious...

 

[StatGuy2000]

So you are the poorest person in your city? All those with less than a university degree have moved away (or died off)? Or do you just exclude yourself to the rich neighborhood? I'm suspicious...

Let me give you some perspective.

I live in Toronto, ON, Canada. In the downtown part of the city, the average price of a detached home is $920000, the average price of a condo is $370000, and the average price of a townhome is $478000. The average price of a detached home in the more outlying areas within the city is not much cheaper, closer to $600000.

The average rent for a 1 bedroom apartment is $1000-1200 per month. And taking into account that the income taxes take about 30-40% of a full-year's salary, to live comfortably you would need to earn a minimum of $45000 per year, and normally such a salary is only open to those with at least some form of post-secondary education (either a community college diploma or a university degree).

 

[thegreenlaser]

Well, we all know math and physics are not going to be hot anytime in the near future. So, I think you can very well rule out careers that are definitely not going to be "hot" when you graduate. In my case I love computers. Choosing math rather computer science or sticking it out with my EE major was mostly just ignorance on my part. It's fine to choose the "hotter" of two things that you like. I think a lot of people do what I did and just kind of go with whatever seems the coolest to you at the time. But what YOU think is cool can change, just as easily as what's hot, and there's no point in choosing something that's 5% cooler to you at the time when it's less marketable.

As usual, I think the truth is somewhere in between the extremes. I remember as a high school student I was always told to pursue my passions and don't worry about the career prospects. That seems to be common advice these days, but I'm glad I ignored it---it seems like people like you have been hurt by it. Career prospects and money shouldn't be the only factor in picking your degree, but they certainly shouldn't be ignored. Like any engineering problem, there are risks and tradeoffs, and every person needs to figure out the balance of passion and career prospects that works for them. I personally went with something I was a little bit less passionate about (engineering) to get a lot more security in my career. For me, I think that was the right choice. For other people, it might be different.

 

[homeomorphic]

The rational choice is to pick the option that gives you the best expected return on investment. If you are going to try to be a physics professor, given the odds, that would mean that being a physics professor should be in the neighborhood of 10 times as good as your second favorite choice, unless you have a well thought-out exit strategy. It's doubtful that there are many people for which that will be true.

 

[jedishrfu]

The rational choice is to pick the option that gives you the best expected return on investment. If you are going to try to be a physics professor, given the odds, that would mean that being a physics professor should be in the neighborhood of 10 times as good as your second favorite choice, unless you have a well thought-out exit strategy. It's doubtful that there are many people for which that will be true.

As far as college goes, its very hard to make a rational choice. If you have the smarts and can swing the funding go if not then it depends on your timing as you slowly lose your academic skills and it will make it more difficult to jump back into learning (over a 5 to 10 year period). You don't have all of the facts until you've lived your life and can look back on it. In some jobs, even if you were qualified for some position you might not even be considered since you don't have the degree. Of course, you wouldn't know this because someone else got the job.

(happened to me once, I told my boss I was considering grad school and so a training opportunity came up and went to my coworker and not me. I didn't find out until later when they discovered I was going part-time to a local grad school and would still be at work.)

 

[jkl71]

I remember as a high school student I was always told to pursue my passions and don't worry about the career prospects. That seems to be common advice these days, but I'm glad I ignored it---it seems like people like you have been hurt by it.

When people give that advice I get the feeling it makes them feel good about themselves. I wonder how they would react if they met people that actually took it and ended up at dead ends when they would have had better chances at a nice career that wasn't exactly what they wanted.

That advice is also easy for lazy people to give. Most things in life involve tradeoffs, e.g. as homeomorphic outlined a consideration of reward vs probability of success. Considering these tradeoffs requires some thought, and perhaps telling people things they don't want to hear. Whereas giving categorical advice like "pursue your passion" doesn't require any thinking at all and often involves telling someone what they want to hear.

 

[StatGuy2000]

Part of the difficulty in giving meaningful advice is that what is "marketable" can also change during the duration of when a student would be attending college/university. It's much easier for people to tell others to pursue their passions because to suggest otherwise would involve trying to determine what compromise would lead to the greatest probability of success, when that probability can shift. And ultimately, a person must choose whether to (a) attend college/university at all, and (b) if he/she decides to attend college/university, what field to major in.

If I was asked the question in the title of this thread by others, my first thought would be to strongly encourage them to pursue some form of post-secondary education, simply because doing so would expand the opportunities available in terms of employment, as well as providing opportunities for social development, networking, and expansion of one's horizons. At the same time, I would also advise those individuals to carefully consider what to major in, think about what they want to do upon graduation (and be realistic about what they can do), and work towards developing marketable skills either as part of their overall plan or as a backup.

 

[Vanadium 50]

Following one's passion is good advice. However, there are a lot of implicit assumptions built in there that are not helpful:

• Following one's passion must be one's career. One cannot use one's 'day job' to finance this passion.
• One's career must narrowly match one's college major. In particular, a STEM major should not sully one's hands with the wheels of commerce.
• By virtue of graduating from college, the world owes me a job in my chosen field.

 

[ModusPwnd]

...to live comfortably you would need to earn a minimum of $45000 per year...

Looks like you are moving the goalpost. You never said live comfortably, you said live. Comfort is a matter of taste and I won't deny your personal tastes. But let's not pretend that your baseline for comfort is somehow the minimum required to live. That is ridiculous and lacks perspective.

(BTW, I find plenty of place to live in the Toronto area far cheaper than your averages;
http://toronto.craigslist.ca/search/apa?sale_date=-&maxAsk=800

And according to this, less than half of citizens in Toronto over 15 have a BS degree or higher (which you claimed was necessary to live);
http://www1.toronto.ca/city_of_toro...kgrounder-labour-education-work-commuting.pdf)

 

[462chevelle]

Unless of course they become foremen or managers...

If your good, efficient, and make a lot of money for a company. They won't let you do that, they will keep you doing the hard labor because the new hires are mostly incompetent kids on their cell phones.

 

[jedishrfu]

If your good, efficient, and make a lot of money for a company. They won't let you do that, they will keep you doing the hard labor because the new hires are mostly incompetent kids on their cell phones.

This is true until they get some small injury that sidelines them for a bit or they make the play of going to a competitor and then the company starts to think its a good idea to hold onto them a little longer as a foreman or manager. Most likely this will be the top ten percent of their workforce.

 

[madilyn]

The chart strangely illustrates that dropping out of college puts you practically ahead of those with a Master's/PhD for 25 years (18 to 42 years old). Factoring in discounted cash flow, dropping out of college seems to be the dominant strategy according to this data.

 

[StatGuy2000]

Looks like you are moving the goalpost. You never said live comfortably, you said live. Comfort is a matter of taste and I won't deny your personal tastes. But let's not pretend that your baseline for comfort is somehow the minimum required to live. That is ridiculous and lacks perspective.

(BTW, I find plenty of place to live in the Toronto area far cheaper than your averages;
http://toronto.craigslist.ca/search/apa?sale_date=-&maxAsk=800

And according to this, less than half of citizens in Toronto over 15 have a BS degree or higher (which you claimed was necessary to live);
http://www1.toronto.ca/city_of_toro...kgrounder-labour-education-work-commuting.pdf)

As far as your first link on Craigslist is concerned, many of the apartments listed aren't even in Toronto (Richmond Hill is a separate city located outside of Toronto, for example). And if you've ever looked at some of the cheaper apartments you see, the reason why many of these places are cheaper than average include the following:

(a) they are basement apartments of people's homes,

(b) they are located in dangerous neighbourhoods, where gang activities and drug-dealing are rampant (yes, Americans, as hard as it is to believe for many of you, there are dangerous neighbourhoods here in Toronto, Ontario, Canada),

(c) there may be serious issues with the apartments themselves, such as hygiene problems (e.g. rats, cockroaches, bedbugs), or facility issues (problems with water, heat, etc.)

Now as far as your second link, first, what you actually see is that 69% of all residents of Toronto between 25 and 64 years of age (the prime working age demographic that is of interest) have a post-secondary degree, which means a BS degree of higher from a university or a certificate or diploma program from community college (community colleges in Canada are somewhat different from those in the US, in that they tend to focus on practical job certificate programs rather than providing the equivalent of the first 2 years of a 4-year college/university degree)

Second of all, what you see is that 33% of Toronto residents 15 years of age or older have a BS degree or higher, and 15% of such residents have a certificate/diploma or higher -- this only takes into account those in the age range of 15-24 who have completed a degree or diploma, and doesn't take into account those who are still in school. So it doesn't necessarily disprove my point.

Also, keep in mind that there is a not insignificant number of residents of Toronto living in poverty in subsidized or public housing, and those areas tend to be hotbeds for crime and gang activity, as is the case in many cities in the US.

I should also add that when I said that you need to earn $45000 or more to live "comfortably", I meant to live in a place that is not crime-ridden and where you can afford to buy groceries without resorting to food banks, and still have some money left over to build your savings.

 

[jedishrfu]

I think the thread has run its course and perhaps should be closed now.

 

[homeomorphic]

Following one's passion must be one's career. One cannot use one's 'day job' to finance this passion.

I don't think everyone is assuming that. I never did when I chose to get my PhD.

One's career must narrowly match one's college major. In particular, a STEM major should not sully one's hands with the wheels of commerce.

It must qualify you for a job, if you are not very good at doing that yourself. That doesn't mean that that's the only thing it should do. This only applies to people who are bad at selling themselves. If you are bad at selling yourself, you should get the most marketable degree for which you like the subject. If you are an ace at selling yourself, or even if you know someone else who is an ace at selling you, feel free to get any major you want. Or if you are a career masochist, you can also feel free to get whatever degree you want.

By virtue of graduating from college, the world owes me a job in my chosen field.

Straw man. That's not what I think the world owes me, personally. What I do think the world owed me was for someone to tell me how complicated it was going to be to get a job from the beginning, so that I wouldn't have made the mistakes that I did. And that is exactly what I am now doing for other people on here, now that it is too late for myself. I really could care less what job I get. I'd frankly be content to be a janitor, but the only reason I don't go out and be a janitor is because I was under the impression that it IS possible for me to find something better with PhD, and because I might want to finance my passions that I can pursue aside from my day job, and being a janitor would probably only pay enough to get by.

 

[homeomorphic]

Actually, the world owing us a job is not as outlandish a request as it may seem when put in those terms. Is it a good idea for us as a society to waste the resource of people who were smart and hardworking enough to get a degree in math or physics, and instead, just make them work at pizza places? I would argue that that is not a good use of our resources as a society. And there may be money to be made here, so there is actually a financial case to be made for this. The point is that these people are undervalued. So, there could be profit to be made by placing them. And we do see headhunters and the like actually putting this principle to work. If you invest in a commodity that is about to go up way up in value, you make money. The problem is that employers tend to be so risk-averse that they don't want to make the investment.

If I were more of a business type, maybe I'd be inspired to go out there and make money off of this myself, but since I'm not the only thing I can promise is that, if someone helps me out and helps me get a job, I'm going to pay it forward and help every damn person I can get a job. THAT is my one of my passions, now. So, to hell with this every man for himself, every man for himself and life is just tough and unfair crap.

 

[symbolipoint]

I don't think everyone is assuming that. I never did when I chose to get my PhD.




It must qualify you for a job, if you are not very good at doing that yourself. That doesn't mean that that's the only thing it should do. This only applies to people who are bad at selling themselves. If you are bad at selling yourself, you should get the most marketable degree for which you like the subject. If you are an ace at selling yourself, or even if you know someone else who is an ace at selling you, feel free to get any major you want. Or if you are a career masochist, you can also feel free to get whatever degree you want.




Straw man. That's not what I think the world owes me, personally. What I do think the world owed me was for someone to tell me how complicated it was going to be to get a job from the beginning, so that I wouldn't have made the mistakes that I did. And that is exactly what I am now doing for other people on here, now that it is too late for myself. I really could care less what job I get. I'd frankly be content to be a janitor, but the only reason I don't go out and be a janitor is because I was under the impression that it IS possible for me to find something better with PhD, and because I might want to finance my passions that I can pursue aside from my day job, and being a janitor would probably only pay enough to get by.

The H.R. people will still try to put a label on you and say that you are supposed to do what your label says you are. Sometimes a person is lucky and finds open minded administrators, or sometimes the head meet you on one of your good days and you impress them really well.

 

[homeomorphic]

You can't have it both ways (i.e. you shouldn't care about your major, as far as getting a job, but the employers, on the other hand, have a very special, God-given right to care about your major because, after all, they don't owe you anything). That's just a recipe for disaster. One could almost imagine the creator of this recipe for disaster celebrating when the unemployment rate for new grads goes up because it shows how they were all pursuing their Puritanical educational duty to sacrifice their careers for the sake of a better education.