To measure only one qubit of two

  • Thread starter Thread starter nomadreid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure Qubit
nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,748
Reaction score
243
If you have a two-qubit system |x>[(|0>-|1>)/√2], whereby x∈{0,1}, and you want to just know x, do you
(a) assume that this means that |x> belongs to one particle, (|0>-|1>)/√2 to another particle, so you just measure the first particle? or
(b) if you can't tell the particles apart, pass this through a gate (Identity ⊗ Hadamard) to get either 2 of the same (in which case x=1) or 2 different (in which case x =0),
(c) other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You just measure the first qubit.

If you can't tell them apart, you wouldn't be able to apply an operation like I x H, because that applies a different gate to each of them (and thus requires telling them apart). If you can apply different gates to them, but can't measure them individually in-place for some reason, just do a controlled-not off of the first one onto a third qubit then measure the third qubit.

You may find playing with a quantum circuit simulator like this one helpful. Drag gates onto the wires and see how it affects the probabilities (shown at the right of the wires), the final quantum state before measuring (shown bottom right), and the intermediate quantum states (shown next to bottom left when you hover over a column).
 
  • Like
Likes nomadreid
Thanks very much, Strilanc. The explanation makes sense, and the simulator link will be very helpful.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top