Top strange bottom charm quark

  • Thread starter Thread starter huhjinsoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quark Strange
huhjinsoo
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
material made from up and down quark
but we have four more quark
what they are do??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They make other materials.
 
Simon Bridge said:
They make other materials.

example please..
 
Apart from the inner regions of neutron stars, they are not stable in our universe. They played an important role in the early universe, however.
 
huhjinsoo said:
example please..
We see these quarks in many mesons and also deduce their existence from some interactions.

An up or a down quark paired with a strange quark (incl antiparticles) gets you a kaon.
The charm quark-antiquark pair forms the J/ψ meson.
The B-meson includes the bottom quark.

mfb is correct, they do not make stable particles.
The top quark forms are so unstable they don't appear at all.

Just google for the name of the quark you are looking for and you'll find all the examples you can hope for. The wikipedia pages have a potted history telling you what was so special ... i.e. what is so strange about strange particles.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top