Top SUNY Schools for Physics: Which One Reigns Supreme?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Apexny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics School
AI Thread Summary
Stony Brook University is widely regarded as the best SUNY school for physics, noted for its strong program and proximity to a particle accelerator. It offers excellent research opportunities, particularly for undergraduates, and features prominent faculty, including Peter van Nieuwenhuizen, known for his work on Supergravity. Geneseo is mentioned as a secondary option due to its new science building with good facilities, including a particle accelerator, but it lacks an engineering program, which may deter some students. Geneseo is also perceived as more selective, attracting academically strong students, although its remote location is a consideration. Overall, Stony Brook stands out for its comprehensive offerings in physics and research potential.
Apexny
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Although this question has probably already been asked, I had trouble finding much on the topic, and I wanted to reserve the right to post follow-up questions if needed.

So which SUNY school is the best for physics?

Thank You.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think Stony Brook is the best SUNY all around. They also seem to have the best physics program as far as I know and are also located to a particle accelerator.
 
While slightly limited on the research front, Geneseo might be another place to look at. The new science building there has excellent facilities, including a particle accelerator and some facilities for astronomy. At the very least it is more selective than all the other SUNYs, and thus "Smarter" students are going there, if that's worth anything.
Be warned though that there is no actual engineering program on campus, so if you are considering engineering as a possibility it would probably be a bad choice.
 
jeffasinger said:
While slightly limited on the research front, Geneseo might be another place to look at. The new science building there has excellent facilities, including a particle accelerator and some facilities for astronomy. At the very least it is more selective than all the other SUNYs, and thus "Smarter" students are going there, if that's worth anything.
Be warned though that there is no actual engineering program on campus, so if you are considering engineering as a possibility it would probably be a bad choice.


You also get the benefit of being the the Middle of Nowhere,NY. J/k I don't know much about Geneseo but it does seem quite distant from well, anything.
 
There is a big difference between being down the road from a national laboratory and having a 1.7 MeV pellatron - essentially, a big Van De Graaf. I'm not saying one is better than the other, but "they have a particle accelerator too" doesn't give the right impression.
 
I'm applying to SUNY Stony Brook as a high school senior. Stony Brook has an excellent physics program, and Peter van Nieuwenhuizen works there as a professor (proposed the theory of Supergravity). In addition I heard they have great oppertunities for research with a lot of attention focused on their undergrads. I really hope I get accepted!
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Back
Top