Top traits essential for a physicist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nano-Passion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physicist
AI Thread Summary
Key traits essential for physicists include creativity, curiosity, and a strong work ethic, which are crucial for both theoretical and experimental contributions. Creativity is particularly important at the cutting edge of physics, where higher expertise leads to unique insights that may seem unconventional to others. The ability to explore alternative ideas and their implications is also highlighted as a vital skill for intellectual growth. Additionally, a playful approach to problem-solving can enhance a physicist's effectiveness. Overall, these traits foster innovation and deeper understanding in the field of physics.
Nano-Passion
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
0
What are the top traits that are important for a physicist's ability to contribute (theoretical or experimental)?

How important of a role does creativity play in theoretical physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Curiosity.
 
Arguably, "creativity" plays an important role in all intellectual work, and is more important and easier to achieve the closer you get to the cutting edge of a subject. I don't think that there's anything special about creativity; It's just that the higher your expertise is in whatever it is you work with, the harder it is for people who have a lower level of understanding of the subject to understand how you come up with your ideas, and what it is that you see that they don't, and therefore they think that you're creative. I think one of the most important skills to develop as any kind of intellectual person is the habit of actively and deliberately exploring alternative ideas and their consequences.

So my answer is: Obsessiveness, curiosity, and playfulness.P.S. I'm not a physicist.
 
Hard work.
Read "The Creative Habit" by Twyla Tharp
 
Read Great Physicists: The Life and Times of Leading Physicists from Galileo to Hawking for the answer to your question. There's many funny, light hearted stories about the lives of the physicists.

I vividly remember one about Lord Kelvin: He took out friends on his yacht. Not long after they set sail he ran into the cabin and started working on some "calculations."
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top