Topological Insulators and Inversion Symmetry

Goalie33
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I was curious if specific symmetries (or lack thereof) in crystal structure are necessary for the formation of topological insulators. Specifically, do we require that inversion symmetry (or inversion asymmetry) be present in the lattice in order to form the TI state?

Thanks,
Goalie33
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, the only symmetry that is required is Time reversal (I presume that by topological insulators you mean the Z2 variety). There are material realizations for both inversion symmetric and asymmetric crystals.
 
Inversion symmetry is convient though, because it allows for an easy way to determine if a material is a TI. (See Fu, Kane 2007)
 
Thanks,
I found that paper and it clarifies some questions. Originally, I wasn't sure if it was required or just convenient, but now I know.
Thanks!
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top