Is the Set of Rational Numbers with the Relative Topology Not Locally Compact?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the set of rational numbers with the relative topology is not locally compact. A topological space is defined as locally compact if, for every point, there exists an open set containing that point whose closure is compact. The original poster expresses confusion and requests a proof, but is reminded that homework helpers require evidence of personal effort before providing assistance. The conversation also includes a humorous comment about wanting a Saleen S7, indicating a light-hearted tone amidst the academic inquiry. Ultimately, the focus remains on the need to demonstrate the non-local compactness of the rational numbers.
bighadi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that the set of rational numbers with the relative topology as a subset of the real numbers is not locally compact

Homework Equations



none

The Attempt at a Solution



I am totally confused and want someone to give me a proof. I have looked at some stuff online but nothing made sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You would like someone to give you a proof? I would like someone to give me a Saleen S7. Neither is going to happen in the immediate future. Note this from the guidelines.

1) Did you show your work? Homework helpers will not assist with any questions until you've shown your own effort on the problem. Remember, we help with homework, we don't do your homework.
 


Okay, let's start with a definition:

A topological space X is locally compact if for each p \in X, there is an open set W such that p \in W and \overline{W}, the closure of W, is compact.

So, since we are trying to show that Q is not locally compact, we need to show that there exists p \in X such that for all open sets W and p \notin W and \overline{W} is not compact.

Assuming I wrote the negation of being locally compact correctly, how do I show the the above statement?

[By the way, I would also love getting a Saleen S7.]

I think I posted this under the wrong section. I meant to put it under "Calculus and beyond".
 
Last edited:
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top