Topology- Hyperplane proof don't understand

  • Thread starter Thread starter zeion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Topology
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving that the interior of a set defined by a hyperplane in R^n is empty. The original poster discusses the geometric interpretation of the hyperplane as a plane in R^3 and contemplates the implications of dimensionality on the proof.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the proof by considering the dimensionality of the hyperplane and its relation to open balls in R^n. Some participants question whether demonstrating the existence of points in a ball that do not lie on the hyperplane suffices for the proof. Others raise concerns about differentiating between points and vectors in this context.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different angles of the proof and clarifying concepts related to points, vectors, and dimensionality. There is no explicit consensus yet, but various lines of reasoning are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the constraints of the problem, including the requirement to prove the statement rigorously while grappling with the definitions and properties of hyperplanes and their dimensions.

zeion
Messages
455
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Let \mathbf {a} \in R^n be a non zero vector, and define {S = \mathbf {x} \in R^n : \mathbf {a} \cdot \mathbf {x} = 0 }. Prove that S interior = {\o}


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Intuitively I understand that if a is a vector in R^3, S would be a plane. And if I place an open ball on any point on the plane it would include points that are not on the plane. So S interior would be empty.

But I'm not sure how to prove this rigorously?
I'm supposed to somehow use the hint that a hyperplane in R^n will have 1 dimension less than R^n (like the plane in R^3 has 2 dimensions)
But I am confused about the dimension of the plane? All vectors on a plane in R^3 will have 1 (the same) component = 0? So does this mean that the dimension of the plane is 2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can I just show that there is a point in the ball that has n components ?
Instead of n-1
 
zeion said:
Can I just show that there is a point in the ball that has n components ?
Instead of n-1

If a.x=0 you can pretty easily find a point y in any ball around x such that a.y is not zero.
 
I'm a little confused about that.
Do I need to differentiate between a point and a vector?
Like if I show that there are points in the ball that are not on the plane, then do I need to specify that the vector corresponding to that point is not perp a ?
 
zeion said:
I'm a little confused about that.
Do I need to differentiate between a point and a vector?
Like if I show that there are points in the ball that are not on the plane, then do I need to specify that the vector corresponding to that point is not perp a ?

Now I'm confused about that. Any point y in the ball around x of radius r is given by y=x+a where 'a' is any vector whose length is less than r. An awful lot of them don't satisfy a.y=0. Can you find just one?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K