What is the equation for helical path length around a torus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BasicWill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbits
AI Thread Summary
The discussion seeks an analytical expression for the helical path length around a torus, emphasizing the need for precision rather than approximation. It suggests starting with a parameterization of the torus, defined by a cross-section radius r and a central circle radius R greater than r. Participants are advised to differentiate this parameterization to find tangent vectors and create a vector field with undetermined coefficients. The conversation hints at considering specific "pitch" for the helical path and finding integral curves based on this setup. Overall, the focus is on deriving a mathematical formula for the helical path length on a toroidal surface.
BasicWill
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know the equation for the helical path length around a torus?
I need an analytical expression, not an approximation.

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hint: write a parameterization of your surface (torus of cross-section radius r centered on a circle with radius R > r). Find the tangent vectors to this surface by differentiating wrt the two parameters of your parameterization. Consider a linear combination with undetermined coefficients to obtain a vector field lying in the torus. (Did you have a particular "pitch" in mind?) Find the integral curves.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top