How is momentum conserved when external forces are present?

  • Thread starter Thread starter azizlwl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Torque
AI Thread Summary
Momentum is conserved in the collision between the mallet and the stake despite the presence of gravity because the time interval of the collision is extremely short, during which gravity does not significantly alter the momentum. The mallet's speed upon impact is calculated using v = √(2gy), and momentum conservation is expressed as Mv = (M+m)v'. Although gravity exerts a force, its effect on momentum during this infinitesimal time frame is negligible, as it does not perform work on the system. The discussion emphasizes that while external forces exist, their influence can be minimal if the collision duration is brief. Thus, momentum conservation holds true in this scenario.
azizlwl
Messages
1,066
Reaction score
10
Sorry the title should be : Impulse and Momentum

3000Solved Problems in Physics-Shaum's

9.6:
A camper let's fall a heavy mallet of mass M from the height y upon the top of a tent stake of mass m and drives it into the ground a distance d. Find the resistance of the ground, assuming it to be constant and the stake and mallet stay together on impact.

Solution given:

The speed of the mallet on just striking the stake is v= √(2gy). Momentum is conserved at the instant of collision so that Mv=(M+m)v', where v' is the speed of the stake plus mallet just after impact.


My question is why the momentum is conserved since there is external force acting on the system, that is gravity.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
azizlwl said:
The speed of the mallet on just striking the stake is v= √(2gy). Momentum is conserved at the instant of collision so that Mv=(M+m)v', where v' is the speed of the stake plus mallet just after impact.My question is why the momentum is conserved since there is external force acting on the system, that is gravity.

Mind the wording. They write "at the instant..." or "just after". That means that the time interval is extremely small, infinitesimal. The time just before impact and just after impact are extremely close. In such a short instance of time gravity has done no work on the system, thus momentum is conserved.

Take for example "the instant of time" you drop something from rest. You've already dropped it, but it's speed is still zero. At least a measurable interval of time has to pass before gravity can change the momentum.
 
Last edited:
Thank you.
But I still believe how small the time interval is, the gravity does not stop from exerting force.
 
Okay. It's true there's still a gravitational force, but the change in momentum is equal to the force times the time interval:

\frac{\mathrm{d}p}{\mathrm{d}t} = F
\Delta p = \int F\;\mathrm{d}t = F \Delta t = 0

So, even when there is a force (which I have never denied), momentum is conserved as long as this force doesn't do any work.
 
azizlwl said:
Thank you.
But I still believe how small the time interval is, the gravity does not stop from exerting force.
Sure, but if the duration of the collision is very short, the force of gravity is a tiny fraction of the force of the collision. Consider what happens if you just rest the hammer on the stake (nothing).
 
jahaan said:
Okay. It's true there's still a gravitational force, but the change in momentum is equal to the force times the time interval:

\frac{\mathrm{d}p}{\mathrm{d}t} = F
\Delta p = \int F\;\mathrm{d}t = F \Delta t = 0

So, even when there is a force (which I have never denied), momentum is conserved as long as this force doesn't do any work.

I think FΔt≠0 since Δt≠0
You can assume it is so small that its product is negligible.
But if F is large value then the product should have the effect on momentum.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top