Torque Calculation for Restoring Angular Speed of Two Disks

AI Thread Summary
A uniform circular disk with a radius of 0.200 m and mass of 1.00 kg rotates at 10.0 radians/second, while a second smaller disk is dropped onto it, leading to a common angular speed of 9.4 rad/s. The fraction of initial rotational kinetic energy converted to heat during this process is calculated to be 0.0588. To restore the angular speed to the original value, the required torque was initially calculated as 0.0197 Nm, which was found to be incorrect due to rounding errors. The correct torque, accounting for precise calculations, is approximately 0.0913 Nm. The discussion highlights the importance of accuracy in calculations, especially in web-based homework settings.
amcavoy
Messages
663
Reaction score
0
A uniform circular disk of radius R = 0.200 m and mass M = 1.00 kg rotates with angular speed wo = 10.0 radians/second on a frictionless pivot. A second disk, having half the radius of the first and made of the same material, is supported at rest a small distance above the first disk. When the small disk is dropped concentrically onto the larger disk, friction eventually causes the disks to reach a common angular speed.

What is the final angular speed?

I came up with 9.4 rad/s, which is correct.

What fraction of the initial rotational kinetic energy is converted to heat in the process?

I came up with .0588, which is also correct.

A motor must restore the angular speed of the combination to wo in one revolution. What torque must the motor supply ?

I used the equation \tau=I\alpha here. I added each moment of inertia (for each disk individually):

I=I_1+I_2=.02125

The above I got using the standard formula for the moment of inertia for a disk (1/2)mr2.

Now I found the acceleration:

10^2=9.4^2+2\alpha\left(2\pi\right)\implies\alpha=.926\text{rad}/\text{sec}^2

Then I multiplied the acceleration by the moment of inertia to come up with:

\tau=.0197\text{Nm}

...however the above is incorrect. Could someone please tell me why? I have gone through my steps many times, meaning that the only way this could be wrong is if I took the wrong steps; my arithmetic is fine. I'd appreciate any input on this.

Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
your procedure is correct ... your final solution for tau does have some round-off error in it from rounding the final omega from the 1st part of the problem ... 9.4 rad/s.

If you don't round, you should get tau = .0913092394 Nm

If this is an on-line problem that is machine graded, that could be the reason.
 
Thank you very much. It's nice to know my problem was in rounding digits rather than my procedure (it is web-based homework by the way).

Thanks again.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top