Calculating Torque for Rotating Disk: Specs, Friction, and Weight Considerations

Click For Summary
To calculate the torque required for a motor to rotate a disk at a constant speed, factors beyond motor friction torque must be considered, including air resistance and bearing friction. The weight of the disk influences torque calculations primarily through its effect on frictional torque; heavier disks can lead to bearing failure and motor stalling. While ideal equations may simplify calculations, real-world conditions necessitate accounting for these additional forces. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate torque assessments. Proper evaluation of all torque factors ensures reliable motor performance.
jayant C
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I am trying to calculate the torque required by the motor to rotate a disk at a constant speed. Specs are as follows:
1. Disk radius =80mm
2. Disk Thickness =2 mm
3. Disk Weight =50gm
4. Constant speed= 3000rpm(CONSTANT)
5. Motor friction torque= 1mNm
6. Disk position parallel to ground.My question are as following:
1 Other than motor friction torque what are the other torque to be considered to calculate the total torque required to maintain the constant speed?
2. Dose the weight of the disk come in picture to calculate the torque? if yes what is the equation?

If possible please provide the equations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jayant C said:
1 Other than motor friction torque what are the other torque to be considered to calculate the total torque required to maintain the constant speed?
There's air resistance around the moving disk, friction in the bearings, and a host of others. You'll have to decide for yourself which of these are negligible or are already counted in the "motor friction"
2. Dose the weight of the disk come in picture to calculate the torque?
In an idealized situation, only to the extent that it affects the frictional torque. In the real world if the disk is too heavy bearings will fail, the motor will stall, stuff will break or otherwise stop behaving according to the simple idealized equations.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K